2014
DOI: 10.1177/0255761414528435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing stylistically challenging contemporary classical repertoire for performance: Interpreting Kumari

Abstract: Research involving the learning processes of musicians seldom examines specific pieces of music, and limited attention has been devoted to the earliest stages of learning a stylistically challenging or new piece of 20th-/21st-century art music. This article describes the processes by which two pianists (the authors) learned Ross Edwards's Kumari, for solo piano. In doing so, it outlines five "elements" in a model for understanding or replicating that process. A key finding is the concept that some modern reper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A new type of collaboration arising from this research, and not identified in previous studies, was labelled ‘creative collaboration’ in order to reflect opportunities where performers and composers could work together to come up with a collaborative solution. For performers, Chaffin and Imreh's (2002) stages of learning a piece of music were used, including the extensions from Viney and Blom (2014) in considering newly-composed pieces. Performers’ approaches to solving these challenges were classified in terms of Hultberg's definition of reproductive and explorative approaches (2002), concerning whether the performer had attempted to follow the composer's intentions to the letter, or whether they had found a different solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A new type of collaboration arising from this research, and not identified in previous studies, was labelled ‘creative collaboration’ in order to reflect opportunities where performers and composers could work together to come up with a collaborative solution. For performers, Chaffin and Imreh's (2002) stages of learning a piece of music were used, including the extensions from Viney and Blom (2014) in considering newly-composed pieces. Performers’ approaches to solving these challenges were classified in terms of Hultberg's definition of reproductive and explorative approaches (2002), concerning whether the performer had attempted to follow the composer's intentions to the letter, or whether they had found a different solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polishing 6. Maintenance However, in preparing an unfamiliar contemporary classical piece for performance, Viney and Blom (2014) find that an interpretational platform needs to be established before an understanding of the score elements can be properly achieved in stages 1-3 (scouting it out -the gray stage). This platform involves: 1) getting to know the composer, 2) reading the score, 3) engaging with musical parameters, 4) anchoring and 5) discussing the issues which involve actions such as researching biographical information and previous works, listening to recordings, finding non-musical information on the score that can help with interpretation such as the title, and making sense of the notation in being able to perform what is directed.…”
Section: 5 S T a G E S O F L E A R N I N G N E W L Y -C O M P O S Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve such issues, a performer can find use in building an interpretational platform (Viney & Blom, 2015). Although this includes steps that are similar to what is expected when interpreting Western classical music (e.g.…”
Section: Cultivating An Interpretive Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huisman and colleagues attempt to ease this particular challenge by examining the benefit of using a specially designed "embodied" edition over the original score, to look at how this impacts both the amount of rehearsal time and the number of errors made in a subsequent performance. Literature that examines the rehearsal and performance of contemporary works is sparse, despite a few notable exceptions (Barrett, 2014;Clarke et al, 2005;Clarke & Doffman, 2014;Viney & Blom, 2015), and so this article is a welcome contribution that begins to examine how performers decipher and interpret contemporary score information. Demonstrating that an embodied score aids the performer's rehearsal touches on a number of areas within the practice and performance of contemporary music, which this commentary will discuss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Margulis’s research concerned listeners rather than performers and composers, the positive and negative impact of programs notes has been echoed in research that examines the experiences of performers and their relationship with program notes. For example, in their search to understand a stylistically unusual and conceptually challenging work by Australian composer Ross Edwards, pianists Viney and Blom (2015) noted a lack of non-musical (ontological) or programmatic information in the score of Kumari . For Blom, it was structural information that provided the key to understanding the work and allowed a deeper rehearsal process to be undertaken; for Viney, it was ontological information.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%