2017
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prepregnancy Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Odds of Cesarean Delivery in Hispanic Women

Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and cesarean delivery in Hispanics.MethodsWe examined these associations among 1,215 participants in Proyecto Buena Salud, a prospective cohort conducted from 2006–2011 among Hispanic women. Prepregnancy BMI, GWG, and mode of delivery were abstracted from medical records.ResultsA quarter of participants entered pregnancy with obesity, 23% delivered via cesarean, and 52% exceeded Institute of Medicine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, 39% of women had inadequate total GWG and 27% had excessive total GWG. These frequencies are somewhat more extreme than those reported among other U.S. Hispanic populations in Massachusetts, California, North Carolina, and Texas, ranging from 19–33% for inadequate and 36–52% for excessive total GWG . The underlying contributors to lower GWG in our population, particularly among women with normal weight, compared to others are not clear.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, 39% of women had inadequate total GWG and 27% had excessive total GWG. These frequencies are somewhat more extreme than those reported among other U.S. Hispanic populations in Massachusetts, California, North Carolina, and Texas, ranging from 19–33% for inadequate and 36–52% for excessive total GWG . The underlying contributors to lower GWG in our population, particularly among women with normal weight, compared to others are not clear.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Hispanic populations in Massachusetts, California, North Carolina, and Texas, ranging from 19-33% for inadequate and 36-52% for excessive total GWG. [26][27][28][29][30] The underlying contributors to lower GWG in our population, particularly among women with normal weight, compared to others are not clear. Our population was lowincome, which, historically, is a risk factor for inadequate GWG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with information in the general obstetric population [ 44 ] and partially with data in women with GDM where the negative association of iGWG with cesarean delivery did not reach significance [ 13 ]. Since GWG in second [ 45 ] and third trimesters [ 46 ] has been related with cesarean delivery, we consider that the relationships described in this study are partially attributable to GWG taking place after GDM diagnosis and affected by its management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 While there are considerable data available regarding gestational weight gain and obstetric outcomes, most previous studies are limited to a single site, have small sample sizes, or lack diversity among their patient population. 1,4,8,9 Some studies focused only on women who were already obese, prior to pregnancy. 10,11 Furthermore, among multiparous women, personal obstetric history is highly predictive of subsequent pregnancy outcomes, such as cesarean delivery and hypertensive disorders, 12,13 and represents a significant confounder when studying the associations between gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes among women of mixed parity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%