Preprints as a driver of open science: Opportunities for Southeast Asia

Abstract

Southeast Asia is an emerging force of open access scholarly output. For example, Indonesia is in a tight competition with United Kingdom as the largest publisher of open access journals and the second largest producer of open access articles in the world (according to DOAJ and the COKI OA Dashboard, respectively). However, this support for open practices is not yet reflected in institutional research policies in Southeast Asian countries, which still rely on criteria influenced by world university rankings that focus on publication outputs and do not incorporate elements related to research culture, integrity, or open science. Preprints have gained increasing attention across disciplines in the last few years, but they are still not included in institutional policies in SouthEast Asia. This paper discusses the potential for preprints to be a driving force for open science and for quality and integrity in scholarly outputs from Southeast Asia. There is a fledgling preprinting culture in the region, catalyzed by the RINarxiv preprint server in Indonesia and the Malaysia Open Science Platform. We argue that preprints have many advantages: opportunities for open access and for researchers to maintain copyright to their work, wide dissemination, encouraging feedback and critical thinking, and community governance. With these advantages, preprints can become a fast and open communication hub between researchers and all stakeholders in the research process. We recommend regulatory and practical steps to incorporate preprints into science policy and researchers' practices as an effort to promote research integrity, open data and reproducibility.

Exploring Neuroscience Researchers’ Trust in Preprints through Citation Analysis

“…Neuroscience researchers are often on the cutting edge of knowledge, requiring references that reflect the latest developments and discoveries. Preprints fulfill this demand by offering a channel for researchers to share their findings with the scientific community, making them exceptionally current (Irawan et al, 2022). In contrast, the traditional peer-review process, while valuable for ensuring the quality of publications, can be time-consuming, delaying the dissemination of crucial information.…”

Description and analysis of the characteristics of retracted articles addressing public health emergencies: A study investigating COVID-19 articles

“…[12][13][14][15] Before research results are published in formal publications, researchers can publish them on preprint platforms to establish the priority of research results and engage in academic exchange. [16,17] Preprint articles can be published without peer review, and peers can review them online or by sending e-mails. [18,19] In the face of sudden public health events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers may publish unverified or unapproved research results on preprint platforms in attempts to claim priority.…”

Enabling preprint discovery, evaluation, and analysis with Europe PMC

“…Currently, there is a great variety of publishing workflows that incorporate preprints. Journals may offer concurrent submission, use journal-agnostic review services, or opt for post-publication review [57][58]. Diversity in this space provides an opportunity to redefine scholarly communication, but it can be difficult to adapt existing systems to new approaches.…”