2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prepuberal subchronic methylphenidate and atomoxetine induce different long-term effects on adult behaviour and forebrain dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin in Naples High-Excitability rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experimental evidence suggests that only two signaling modulators (DA and 5-HT) are effective in inducing long-term changes within neural networks, which are known to underlie attentive and motivational processes. In fact, prepuberal subchronic treatments with MPH and ATX, which block the reuptake of DA/NE and NE, respectively, did not similarly alter the SSA in adult rats, in spite of significant effects on DA, NA, 5-HT and metabolites at the prefronto-striatal interface in NHE rats [52]. By contrast, we found previously that an INDA-based prepuberal subchronic treatment is effective at a low dose (0.075 mg/kg) [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Our experimental evidence suggests that only two signaling modulators (DA and 5-HT) are effective in inducing long-term changes within neural networks, which are known to underlie attentive and motivational processes. In fact, prepuberal subchronic treatments with MPH and ATX, which block the reuptake of DA/NE and NE, respectively, did not similarly alter the SSA in adult rats, in spite of significant effects on DA, NA, 5-HT and metabolites at the prefronto-striatal interface in NHE rats [52]. By contrast, we found previously that an INDA-based prepuberal subchronic treatment is effective at a low dose (0.075 mg/kg) [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We are also exploring the idea that neurogenesis in the DG of the hippocampus and SVZ is modulated by dopamine terminals from the mesencephalon, which is an attractive hypothesis that provides an explanation for the paradoxical effect of methylphenidate (Ritalin ® ), used for children suffering from attention deficit syndrome (ADS). Dopamine is perhaps needed for inducing neurogenesis in DG and SVZ, promoting neuronal plasticity, as suggested for Ritalin treated children (see Grund et al 2006; Schaeferd et al 2009; Kim et al 2009; also see Banerjee et al 2009; Ruocco et al 2010). The idea is to further investigate the receptors involved in this mechanism, to suggest the use of selective dopamine agonists to treat ADS like syndromes.…”
Section: Apoptosis and Neurogenesis After Perinatal Asphyxiamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, this is unlikely since they also reported that optogenetic inhibition of the LC, which reduced forebrain NE release to a similar extent, did not produce this arrest. Furthermore, atomoxetine (Ruocco et al 2010) and reboxetine (Grandoso et al 2004) have been shown to suppress LC neuron firing rate or NE metabolism, effects which would block behavioral inhibition according to the present hypothesis. It is more likely, therefore, that the arrest resulted from an enhanced release the noradrenergic cotransmitter, galanin, which occurs at high firing rates and can produce inhibition of neural activity in brain areas supporting motivation and motor behaviors (discussed below).…”
Section: Development Of the Behavioral Inhibition Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 60%