2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prepulse inhibition modulation by contextual conditioning of dopaminergic activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amphetamine (3 mg/kg) was dissolved in saline solution. The dose was selected because it was effective in previous experiments (Mena & De la Casa, 2013). The control group received injections of saline (0.9%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amphetamine (3 mg/kg) was dissolved in saline solution. The dose was selected because it was effective in previous experiments (Mena & De la Casa, 2013). The control group received injections of saline (0.9%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pavlov [1] described some experiments to show that repeated morphine administration in the presence of an experimental context resulted in a conditioned response to that context that mimicked some of the unconditional properties of morphine, such as nausea, vomiting, excessive salivation, or sleeping. Subsequently, ample experimental evidence has demonstrated conditioning using the effects of many different drugs as the Unconditioned Stimulus (US) [2,3,4,5]. These studies have focused not only on analyzing the learned associations that emerge after pairing the Conditioned Stimulus (CS) and the US [6,7,8], while also identifying the structures and neural circuits that constitute the neurobiological bases of learning [9,10,11,12], and the causes of drug addictions since conditioning has been proposed as a potential trigger of relapse and tolerance [13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pavlov (1849Pavlov ( -1936, who reported that repeated administration of morphine in the presence of the same context resulted in Conditioned Responses (CR) similar to those produced by the drug itself (Pavlov, 1927). Based on these pioneering studies, numerous investigations have been conducted demonstrating the conditioning of various responses produced by a wide range of drugs, and revealing that sometimes the CR was similar to that induced by the drug (e.g., Battisti et al, 2000;Mena and De la Casa, 2013), while in other cases the CR was opposite to the unconditioned effect of the drug (e.g., Siegel, 1975;Solomon, 1980). To explain these differences, Eikelboom and Stewart (1982) proposed that on some occasions the Conditioned Stimulus (CS) would be associated with a response that depends on the central nervous system, while others times it would be associated with a peripheral response which appears to compensate the effect of the drug.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%