Animal Dispersal 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2338-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presaturation and saturation dispersal 15 years later: some theoretical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1999). This may be due to one of two (not mutually exclusive) causes: one is inhibition of dispersal at high densities (Lidicker 1975; Stenseth 1983; Stenseth & Lidicker 1992), and/or reduced predation through a saturation effect at high density (Julliard et al . 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1999). This may be due to one of two (not mutually exclusive) causes: one is inhibition of dispersal at high densities (Lidicker 1975; Stenseth 1983; Stenseth & Lidicker 1992), and/or reduced predation through a saturation effect at high density (Julliard et al . 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first published evidence of presaturation dispersal in bears. Unfortunately, presaturation dispersal has been defined both as dispersal occurring when population growth rates are positive, and dispersal from a place of residency before the carrying capacity has been reached (Stenseth & Lidicker 1992). The former definition came from observations of dispersal in cyclic rodents (Krebs et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was first described for small mammals (Krebs et al . 1973) and has been most commonly observed in this group of mammals (Stenseth & Lidicker 1992). Sinclair (1992) expected it not to be found in large mammals, except in expanding populations, and even then it would be rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The most striking result was the different relation between density and survival of marked subadults and adults, and the low survival of adults compared to subadults. The positive density effect on subadult survival could originate from at least two phenomena: inhibited dispersal, and hence higher probability of persistence in the population at high density (Lidicker 1975; Stenseth 1983; Brant 1992; Stenseth & Lidicker 1992), or reduced predation rates through a saturation effect at high density. The former is not supported by observational data: the number of new individuals is usually high at high density, and between‐capture movements are small both within and between capture sessions and are not related to density (Leirs 1995; Leirs et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%