This article examines popular political participation in early modern Scotland. In Scotland, some of the preconditions of public politics identified by recent scholars were less obviously present than in England or France. There was no culturally dominant metropolis or royal court; the volume of printed publications, though rising across the period, remained comparatively small. Because of these characteristics, historians of popular involvement in Scottish politics should pay particular attention to the traditional means of participation inherited from the medieval and Reformation periods. The article explores three forms of extrainstitutional participation, each of which evolved out of formal, institutional political practices, but were deployed by ordinary Scots seeking to express their views. Protestations, formal statements of dissent from a statute or decision, developed in the courts, but were used in extramural contexts in the seventeenth century. In towns, crowd demonstrations took the place of traditional means of formal consultation, as urban government became increasingly oligarchical.The article also examines congregational involvement in the appointment of parish ministers in the Reformed Church of Scotland. After this was legally instituted in 1690, significant numbers of small landowners and the landless poor claimed to have a say in the choice of their minister.By employing the concept of the "public sphere" in studies of the early modern period, historians have highlighted developments in political communication that were distinctive to the era. Brian Cowan has pointed out the appeal of the public sphere to post-Namierite historians of 2 England in the late Stuart and Hanoverian periods. The model offers "a means of characterising and conceptually organising proliferating studies of the emergence of public opinion as a factor in political action," emphasising "the efflorescence of print culture" and "the development of new spaces of public sociability."1 Peter Lake and Steve Pincus have noted that a similar rationale motivated historians responding to revisionist accounts of the early and mid seventeenth century. The notion of an early modern public sphere restored ideology to historical analysis through the examination of public arguments, encompassing both manuscript and printed texts. 2 Working across the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, historians have shown how contemporaries came to attribute reasoned judgement and even political authority to representations of public opinion in England and France. 3 Studies in historical linguistics have identified "the public" as a term originating in the 1640s and "public opinion" as a neologism of the 1730s in England. 4 Recognising that the notion of a rational public was itself a historical