“…A total of 26 trials were administered, comprised of 12 trials with the points labeled as 0 and 20 (3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19), and 14 trials with the points labeled as 0 and 100 (7, 9, 15, 16, 26, 28, 51, 53, 64, 65, 76, 77, 89, 91). We selected these two number ranges because they have been used in prior studies of number line estimation skills in 5‐ or 6‐year‐olds (e.g., Berteletti et al, 2010; Ghazali et al, 2013; Hoard et al, 2008). Furthermore, the correct midpoint (i.e., either 10 or 50) was marked with a 0.5‐in.…”