2017
DOI: 10.4996/fireecology.1301149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribed Burning in Ponderosa Pine: Fuel Reductions and Redistributing Fuels near Boles to Prevent Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ing similar to another study in the Blue Mountain Ecoregion approximately 30 km to the north (Progar et al 2017). The nearly 150 % increase we documented for 1000 hr fuels in the fall 5 yr reburn treatment between reburns one and two is due to the higher mortality in the initial fall burns.…”
Section: Reburn (Number)supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ing similar to another study in the Blue Mountain Ecoregion approximately 30 km to the north (Progar et al 2017). The nearly 150 % increase we documented for 1000 hr fuels in the fall 5 yr reburn treatment between reburns one and two is due to the higher mortality in the initial fall burns.…”
Section: Reburn (Number)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…We expected fall 5 yr reburning to continue to consume more fuel than spring reburning as found by others in initial burns (Knapp et al 2005, Fettig et al 2010, Progar et al 2017. However, consumption of woody and forest floor fuels with repeated 5 yr burning was consistently low, and there was a lack of persistent seasonal consumption differences.…”
Section: Reburn (Number)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In ponderosa pine forests the litter layer accounts for ~60% of fuel loading typically targeted for removal with prescribed fire ( Progar et al, 2017 ; Urbanski et al, 2018 ). The EFs we have measured for needles (the primary component of ponderosa pine litter layers), needles + FWD, and needles + cones can be used to improve prescribed fire emission estimates in smoke management tools such as First Order Fire Effects Model (FOFEM; Lutes, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a greater level of damage to fine roots (abundant during this period) can be expected [72,119]. However, fuels are usually described as typically drier later on in the year [120], i.e., during the typical burning season (autumn), which may imply higher mortality rates [114,121,122]. However, other factors such as the activity of insect pests, the climatic conditions following the fire and tree species susceptibility can interact and lead to a complex response [123] and inconclusive results, probably because fire effects often outweigh the effects of other factors [124].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, the temperature at a specific location within a tree will be influenced by the distribution of temperature over the whole bark surface, which is very irregular under fire conditions [55,152]. Only local conditions at the tree level (e.g., the natural accumulation of branches fallen around the tree or lichens growing along the stem) can generate burn intensities that will potentially cause this type of damage [121]. This has already been observed in previous field studies investigating the effect of PB on cambium [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%