2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribed moorland burning meets good practice guidelines: A monitoring case study using aerial photography in the Peak District, UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Allen et al . also state that ‘whilst the specific results obtained from this management unit cannot be extrapolated to any other sites and we do not claim that management on this moor is characteristic of UK moors in general, the method of monitoring proved to be effective’. Grouse moor management has arguably improved the resilience of these dwarf‐shrub communities in the face of disease and outbreaks of pest insects such as Heather Beetle Lochmaea suturalis (Werritty et al .…”
Section: Managed Burning Grazing and Vegetation Controlmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, Allen et al . also state that ‘whilst the specific results obtained from this management unit cannot be extrapolated to any other sites and we do not claim that management on this moor is characteristic of UK moors in general, the method of monitoring proved to be effective’. Grouse moor management has arguably improved the resilience of these dwarf‐shrub communities in the face of disease and outbreaks of pest insects such as Heather Beetle Lochmaea suturalis (Werritty et al .…”
Section: Managed Burning Grazing and Vegetation Controlmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Despite contentious debate over the effects of Heather burning on moorland ecosystem services, a case study on a moor managed for grouse shooting and sheep grazing in the Peak District showed that burning was within the widely accepted good practice guidelines (Allen et al . ). However, Allen et al .…”
Section: Managed Burning Grazing and Vegetation Controlmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Burn severity varies, but good practice guidelines recommend 'cool' burns which remove the canopy layer of vegetation without consuming the moss or litter layer or igniting underlying peat (Defra 2007;Scottish Government 2011). The area of UK peatlands managed by burning has increased in recent decades (Douglas et al 2015;Thacker et al 2015;Yallop et al 2006), causing concern about potential impacts on peatland function and debate about the sustainability of current practice (Allen et al 2016;Brown et al 2016;Harper et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildfire activity is projected to increase due to changes in temperature and rainfall patterns arising from climate change (Krawchuk et al 2009;De Groot et al 2013), possibly leading to more severe disturbances in peatland ecosystems. In some regions such as the British Isles, open peat bogs (sensu Rydin and Jeglum 2013), including blanket and raised bogs, are also subjected to managed burning to promote suitable habitat for livestock, game and wildlife and to manage the risk and severity of wildfires (Fernandes and Botelho 2003;Harris et al 2011;Allen et al 2016). Managed burning is a controversial practice on peat bogs (Davies et al 2016a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%