2020
DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2020.1829161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribed performance controller with affine equivalent model for a class of unknown nonlinear discrete-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 2 and 𝜁 t ,0 is the unknown nonlinear term in system (23). In case 2, L y = 0 and L u = 1, there must be a time-varying parameter vector 𝜙 t , called the PPD vector, so that the system (1) is transformed into the following equivalent CFDL model:…”
Section: Data-driven Model Via Ffdlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 2 and 𝜁 t ,0 is the unknown nonlinear term in system (23). In case 2, L y = 0 and L u = 1, there must be a time-varying parameter vector 𝜙 t , called the PPD vector, so that the system (1) is transformed into the following equivalent CFDL model:…”
Section: Data-driven Model Via Ffdlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After Bechlioulis [19,20] developed the concept of prescribed performance control (PPC), most of the existing related work has been studied in continuous-time cases [21,22]. For discrete-time systems, PPC-based MFAC has also attached some attention [23][24][25]. In these works, the upper and lower bounds affine to the prescribed function are set as 1 or the same value, otherwise the offset error will occur in the steadystate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, the PPC problems in continuous-time systems have been prosperously investigated [21]. Meanwhile, some researchers also studied the PPC problem with MFAC in discrete-time systems [22][23][24]. Among these works, the upper and lower bounds affine to the prescribed function are set as 1 or the same value, otherwise, an offset error would exist in the steady-state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al 26 proposed a new approach by associating the discrete-time quasi-sliding mode control with the PPC method to get high tracking performance. Treesatayapun 27,28 developed the affine data-driven model by a multi-input fuzzy rule emulated network and used PPC to assure the tracking error converge to a small boundary. Liu et al 29,30 first considered the PPC in the MFAC with the sliding mode control method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our best knowledge, no research has yet investigated the DESO-based model-free adaptive sliding mode control for the discrete-time nonlinear processes with external disturbance under predefined performance. Compared to the prescribed performance-based MFAC in discrete-time systems, [26][27][28][29][30][31] a DESO is firstly used to estimate the lumped unknown time-varying term in this paper. Compared to the DESO-based MFAC, 13,21 this paper not only embraces the term relevant to the estimation error of the PPD parameter in the extended state but also ensures that the output tracking error is convergent to a residual set with both prescribed transient-state and steady-state performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%