2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…SBU-rapport nr 200. . This was also valid for surgery performed in clean contaminated regions, such as the oral cavity, head and neck oncology, and colorectal surgery (Brand et al 1982;Johnson et al 1984;Righi et al 1996;Song & Glenny 1998;Hopkins & Smaill 2012;Carroll et al 2003;Andersen et al 2005;Liu et al 2008;Kang et al 2009;Oomens et al 2014). The overall conclusion was that there was no further benefit to the patient by prolonging the antibiotic course beyond the day of surgery, in any field of surgery, including oral and maxillofacial surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SBU-rapport nr 200. . This was also valid for surgery performed in clean contaminated regions, such as the oral cavity, head and neck oncology, and colorectal surgery (Brand et al 1982;Johnson et al 1984;Righi et al 1996;Song & Glenny 1998;Hopkins & Smaill 2012;Carroll et al 2003;Andersen et al 2005;Liu et al 2008;Kang et al 2009;Oomens et al 2014). The overall conclusion was that there was no further benefit to the patient by prolonging the antibiotic course beyond the day of surgery, in any field of surgery, including oral and maxillofacial surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…; Oomens et al. ). The overall conclusion was that there was no further benefit to the patient by prolonging the antibiotic course beyond the day of surgery, in any field of surgery, including oral and maxillofacial surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…14 The Jadad Scale and Delphi List award a maximum of 5 and 9 points to a trial, respectively, signifying a low risk with respect to crucial types of bias (Table 2). 15,16 The 2 scales were used in combination as described by Oomens et al 17 A high-quality study was indicated by a Jadad score of 4 to 5 and a Delphi score of 6 to 9, with lower scores indicating a low-quality trial. 17 …”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oomens et al [36] klassifizierten in einem Review 3 Studien zur Antibiotikaprophylaxe als hochwertig. In der Studie von Lindeboom et al [28] wurden beide Patientengruppen mit einer PAP (Clindamycin 600 mg) versorgt, dann wurde bei einer Patientengruppe postoperativ die antibiotische Therapie weitergeführt.…”
Section: Orthodontische Und Präprothetische Chirurgieunclassified
“…Signifikant höher waren die Wundinfektionsraten in der Gruppe mit der Placebomedikation [49]. Daraus wird geschlussfolgert, dass eine PAP sinnvoll ist und eine postoperative Weiterführung der Antibiose keinen Einfluss auf die Wundinfektionsrate hat [36].…”
Section: Orthodontische Und Präprothetische Chirurgieunclassified