2022
DOI: 10.1055/a-1929-0295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescription of High-intensity Aerobic Interval Training Based on Oxygen Uptake Kinetics

Abstract: Endurance training results in diverse adaptations that lead to increased performance and health benefits. A commonly measured training response is the analysis of oxygen uptake kinetics, representing the demand of a determined load (speed/work) on the cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic systems, providing useful information for the prescription of constant load or interval-type aerobic exercise. There is evidence that during high-intensity aerobic exercise some interventions prescribe brief interval tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our constant load protocol sustained at 70% PWR is commonly used to assess the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions and also to compare interval vs. continuous training in the lower limb on exercise tolerance in patients with COPD [46]. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that different protocols may give different results as previously shown in several studies conducted in healthy people and athletes [47]. Different interval exercise protocols such as shorter working phases or longer periods of active rest might yield different results.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our constant load protocol sustained at 70% PWR is commonly used to assess the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions and also to compare interval vs. continuous training in the lower limb on exercise tolerance in patients with COPD [46]. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that different protocols may give different results as previously shown in several studies conducted in healthy people and athletes [47]. Different interval exercise protocols such as shorter working phases or longer periods of active rest might yield different results.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current guidelines, MICT (low-intensity training in the three-zone model)20 can be prescribed in bouts of any duration,1 yet longer continuous bouts of 10 min or more may be more beneficial 36 37. Regarding interval training during moderate-intensity to high-intensity exercise, we recently proposed that long intervals (ie, ≥1 to 2 min) with ≥1 min recovery period should be prescribed for greater adaptations 38. Certainly, more evidence is needed regarding aerobic exercise programming and the use of the TID model in physically inactive subjects or with health complications; however, we believe it is essential to include more details regarding aerobic exercise programming in future WHO guidelines.…”
Section: Aerobic Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%