2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.103.l040202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence and absence of delocalization-localization transition in coherently perturbed disordered lattices

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the A-type Harper model, we fixed at V = 1.3 as an unperturbated localized side, and investigate the LDT by imposing f ǫ (t), with comparing with results in the already reported 1D kicked Anderson and the Anderson models [39,40].…”
Section: Models and Some Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using the A-type Harper model, we fixed at V = 1.3 as an unperturbated localized side, and investigate the LDT by imposing f ǫ (t), with comparing with results in the already reported 1D kicked Anderson and the Anderson models [39,40].…”
Section: Models and Some Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the Harper model, the case of M = 2 is completely localized on the small side of ǫ, and tends to persist the localization even on the large side of ǫ, and the LDT has not been observed. In other words, in the time-continuous Harper model with coherent multicolor perturbation, the DLT does not occur in the case of M = 2 corresponding to three degrees of freedom system, and the LDT occurs only in a case of M ≥ 3, as seen in 1D Anderson model [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations