2005
DOI: 10.1094/cc-82-0739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence and Amounts of Starch Granule Surface Proteins in Various Starches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In flour stirred in water, they were scarcely visible, an observation which was also made when the cold water soluble fraction of the flour was removed, leading to the conclusion that protein bodies only altered the morphology duing to protein content in treated flour was not reduced greatly from that in untreated flour . It has also been suggested there is starch granule surface proteins, which occupy starch granule surface and bound tightly, and these contribute to the flour's pasting behavior . The presence of additional filler material became apparent in the stirred flour samples, in the form of small particles of much smaller size than intact starch granules (Figure , panels A2‐C2); the effect of including an amylase inhibitor (AgNO 3 ) in the stirring solution was to increase the population of these small particles (compare panels A3‐C3 vs. A2‐C2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In flour stirred in water, they were scarcely visible, an observation which was also made when the cold water soluble fraction of the flour was removed, leading to the conclusion that protein bodies only altered the morphology duing to protein content in treated flour was not reduced greatly from that in untreated flour . It has also been suggested there is starch granule surface proteins, which occupy starch granule surface and bound tightly, and these contribute to the flour's pasting behavior . The presence of additional filler material became apparent in the stirred flour samples, in the form of small particles of much smaller size than intact starch granules (Figure , panels A2‐C2); the effect of including an amylase inhibitor (AgNO 3 ) in the stirring solution was to increase the population of these small particles (compare panels A3‐C3 vs. A2‐C2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Amylose and amylopectin in starch are not fluorescent, but starch granules are known to have a thin protein membrane on their surface (Yoshino et al 2005) and this may the reason for the fluorescence peak similar to that of gluten. Butter is known to contain fluorophors such as carotenoids; fluorescence from these constituents can be measured with a fluorescence spectrophotometer if the sample is thick enough (approximately 2 mm thickness).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows LM and FM images of wet gluten and starchgranule samples stained by 0.5% acid magenta solutions. Pink-colored starch granules were considered to be affected by a slight amount of protein at the membrane surfaces (Yoshino et al 2005). 2A) and almost clear and colorless starch granules (Fig.…”
Section: Selection Of Fluorescent Agent and Filter Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D). Pink-colored starch granules were considered to be affected by a slight amount of protein at the membrane surfaces (Yoshino et al 2005). Figure 3 shows bread dough samples at four different mixing stages (pick-up, clean-up, final, and overmixing), captured by the methods explained previously.…”
Section: Selection Of Fluorescent Agent and Filter Setmentioning
confidence: 99%