2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2017.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence and cybersickness in immersive content: Effects of content type, exposure time and gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, women were more susceptible to SS compared to men; however, this difference was only statistically significant for the SSQ nausea subscale. This result is consistent with a wide body of literature (e.g., [19,20,26,55]), but in contrast with other results from modern study using HMDs (e.g., [78][79][80]). In this regard, a previous work [50] used a different method for administrating the SSQ questionnaire compared to the one used in the present study; they obtained a final SSQ score by subtracting a pre-VR experience SSQ score from the post-VR experience SSQ.…”
Section: Users' Sexsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study, women were more susceptible to SS compared to men; however, this difference was only statistically significant for the SSQ nausea subscale. This result is consistent with a wide body of literature (e.g., [19,20,26,55]), but in contrast with other results from modern study using HMDs (e.g., [78][79][80]). In this regard, a previous work [50] used a different method for administrating the SSQ questionnaire compared to the one used in the present study; they obtained a final SSQ score by subtracting a pre-VR experience SSQ score from the post-VR experience SSQ.…”
Section: Users' Sexsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The experiments were very heterogeneous regarding the number of participants tested, ranging from a minimum of 14 (Robert et al, 2016) to a maximum of 234 (Roettl and Terlutter, 2018). With the exception of a few studies (Munafo et al, 2017;Juan et al, 2018;Melo et al, 2018;Al Zayer et al, 2019), the other studies did not report a balance between male and female participants. Such imbalance may undermine the validity of these studies regarding the reported gender differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview of these studies, their methodologies, and their findings are reported in Table 1 . Two of the included studies were published in 2016 (Allen et al, 2016 ; Robert et al, 2016 ), three in 2017 (Cárdenas-Delgado et al, 2017 ; Munafo et al, 2017 ; Wilson and Kinsela, 2017 ), eight in 2018 (An et al, 2018 ; Juan et al, 2018 ; Khashe et al, 2018 ; Melo et al, 2018 ; Mousas et al, 2018 ; Rangelova and Marsden, 2018 ; Roettl and Terlutter, 2018 ; Scheibler and Rodrigues, 2018 ), eight in 2019 (Al Zayer et al, 2019 ; Bracq et al, 2019 ; Chang et al, 2019 ; Clifton and Palmisano, 2019 ; Liang et al, 2019 ; Moroz et al, 2019 ; Narciso et al, 2019 ; Shafer et al, 2019 ), and one in 2020 (Curry et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the level of presence is significantly reduced for traditional VFTs when directly compared to a more immersive device, the traditional VFTs might still be attractive to students and provide more educational benefits than conventional classroom instruction without VFTs (Stoddard, ). Further, the VFT modules used in this study provided real‐world 360° panoramic images, creating a greater sense of presence than computer‐synthesized content (Melo, Vasconcelos‐Raposo, & Bessa, ). Hence, the TV might have provided a certain degree of presence even with the use of traditional media (Lee et al , ), which was significantly increased with immersive devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%