2013
DOI: 10.14712/23361964.2015.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence, distribution and effect of white, pink and purple morphs on pollination in the orchid Orchis mascula

Abstract: How floral polymorphism of flowering plants can be maintained in evolutionary time has long intrigued ecologists and is still debated. In particular, how floral colour polymorphism influences reproductive success is still poorly understood. Here, we investigated the case of Orchis mascula, a deceptive orchid species in which the presence of rare white-flowered individuals is known to increase the percentage pollination of co-occurring coloured morphs. In a brief review, we report all the orchid species for whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Orchis punctulata and O. purpurea usually grow in small-sized populations (Vakhrameeva et al, 2008). Although the female reproductive success of O. purpurea in the study area was higher compared to the data provided for other deceptive orchids (Claessens and Kleynen, 2011), the respective percentages of O. punctulata were low and similar to those of other nonrewarding orchids (e.g., Schatz et al, 2013). The fact that O. punctulata at the edges of its distribution range is characterized by an almost equal pollination success compared to other populations occurring near the center of its distribution range (Kretzschmar et al, 2007) might demonstrate that its distribution in its westernmost area is not delimited by factors related to its pollination effectiveness.…”
Section: Orchis Purpureacontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Orchis punctulata and O. purpurea usually grow in small-sized populations (Vakhrameeva et al, 2008). Although the female reproductive success of O. purpurea in the study area was higher compared to the data provided for other deceptive orchids (Claessens and Kleynen, 2011), the respective percentages of O. punctulata were low and similar to those of other nonrewarding orchids (e.g., Schatz et al, 2013). The fact that O. punctulata at the edges of its distribution range is characterized by an almost equal pollination success compared to other populations occurring near the center of its distribution range (Kretzschmar et al, 2007) might demonstrate that its distribution in its westernmost area is not delimited by factors related to its pollination effectiveness.…”
Section: Orchis Purpureacontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…At the population scale, such a positive effect of the yellow morph on the global reproductive success has been observed in the deceptive D. sambucina (Pellegrino et al ., ; Smithson et al ., ) and D. incarnata (Vallius et al ., ). This visually attractive effect of pale‐coloured flowers has also been observed in O. mascula (Dormont et al ., ; Schatz et al ., ), in which the presence of a light morph individual increased the reproductive success of all neighbouring individuals (Dormont et al ., ). In a different ecological situation, Levin & Kerster () observed a positive relationship between frequency of the pink morph and seed production in Phlox pilosa , which they interpreted as resulting from the effect of optimal image (pink colour) on pollinator behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food deception is an unusual pollination strategy in which the plant species give no reward to pollinators (Renner, ). Because flower colour is one of the most important cues used by insects to locate flowers (Menzel & Shmida, ; Schoonhoven et al ., ), the three main mechanisms usually invoked to explain the maintenance of deception as a pollination strategy are based on colour: mimicry of a rewarding species (Johnson et al ., ; Juillet et al ., ), exploitation of innate perceptual biases of insects (Peter & Johnson, ; Schaefer & Ruxton, ) and exploitation of naivety of recently emerged pollinators (Jersáková et al ., ; Dormont et al ., ,b; Schatz et al ., ). Whatever the mechanism involved, deceptive plant species are expected to show high variation in floral traits, such as flower colour, because intraspecific variation will delay avoidance learning by the pollinators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This last situation is common in some species or groups such as orchids, where mutations causing non‐pigmented or albino flowers are recurrent (Schatz et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%