2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)81236-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence of Helicobacter species in bile and gallbladder as a risk factor for cholelithiasis/cholecisthitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These discordant results may be due to regional differences, as pointed out by Fallone et al ., 1 especially when it is considered that gastric H. pylori infection is much greater in Brazil than in Canada and the micro‐organism may gain access to the bile by retrograde transfer from the stomach/duodenum. However, it should be noted that DNA from H. pylori has been detected consistently in biliary specimens only when a more sensitive nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used, 3 , 4 as was the case in our study. The sensitivity of conventional PCR is quite low, and it is consistently positive only when the micro‐organism is present at a level of 10 3 colony‐forming units/mL or more in the sample, as confirmed by Fallone et al 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These discordant results may be due to regional differences, as pointed out by Fallone et al ., 1 especially when it is considered that gastric H. pylori infection is much greater in Brazil than in Canada and the micro‐organism may gain access to the bile by retrograde transfer from the stomach/duodenum. However, it should be noted that DNA from H. pylori has been detected consistently in biliary specimens only when a more sensitive nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used, 3 , 4 as was the case in our study. The sensitivity of conventional PCR is quite low, and it is consistently positive only when the micro‐organism is present at a level of 10 3 colony‐forming units/mL or more in the sample, as confirmed by Fallone et al 1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…These results are in disagreement with others that have identified Helicobacter DNA in the bile or gall‐bladder tissue of patients with or without biliary diseases 2 ,. 3 In a similar study, we evaluated the presence of Helicobacter DNA in gall‐bladder tissues and bile samples from 64 Brazilian patients, and found that it was more frequently seen in those with cholelithiasis/cholecystitis 4 . The sequences of the amplified products of the 16S rRNA gene were more than 99.3% similar to that of H. pylori .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…9 However, Fallone et al 13 failed to find DNA of the genus Helicobacter in the bile of Canadian patients with biliary disorders, whilst a completely contrary result was described by Queiroz et al who found bacterial nucleotidic sequences in most Brazilian subjects with similar diseases. 21 To explain these discordant findings, some factors have been invoked such as regional differences due to variable rates of infection and the changing sensitivity of the various PCR techniques used in the above reported studies. 22 Whether H. pylori participates in the pathogenesis of biliary diseases is at the moment a controversial topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%