2018
DOI: 10.1111/ced.13555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence of human papillomavirus 16 in acral Bowen disease as a predictor of a less efficacious response to photodynamic therapy: a retrospective case series of nine patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, HPV39 positivity has not been previously reported in BD. A recent case series indicated that the presence of HPV16 in acral BD could be a predictor for a reduced response to PDT 8 . The HPV16‐positive patient in this series, whose BD displayed locally aggressive growth, showed no response to PDT.…”
Section: Patient No Diagnosis Sex Age Location Lesion Size (Cm × Cm)mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, HPV39 positivity has not been previously reported in BD. A recent case series indicated that the presence of HPV16 in acral BD could be a predictor for a reduced response to PDT 8 . The HPV16‐positive patient in this series, whose BD displayed locally aggressive growth, showed no response to PDT.…”
Section: Patient No Diagnosis Sex Age Location Lesion Size (Cm × Cm)mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A recent case series indicated that the presence of HPV16 in acral BD could be a predictor for a reduced response to PDT. 8 The HPV16-positive patient in this series, whose BD displayed locally aggressive growth, showed no response to PDT. However, no overall correlation between HPV status and response to PDT was found in this case series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Forty-three studies, enrolling a total of 1943 BD lesions and 282 SCC lesions between 1994 and 2019, were used for quantitative analysis. Thirty-two studies 1,2,5,6,11,15–41 used red light, whereas 9 studies 4,42–49 used laser. Twenty-four studies 3,4,6,16,21,28,31–38,40–42,44–50 used aminolevulinic acid (ALA), and 18 studies 1,2,5,11,15–19,22–27,29,30,39 used methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) as a photosensitizer (see Supplemental Digital Content 2 , Table S2, http://links.lww.com/DSS/B13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-two studies 1,2,5,6,11, used red light, whereas 9 studies 4,42-49 used laser. Twenty-four studies 3,4,6,16,21,28,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][40][41][42][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] used aminolevulinic acid (ALA), and 18 studies 1,2,5,11,[15][16][17][18][19][22][23][24][25][26][27]29,30,39 used methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) as a photosensitizer (see Supplemental Digital Content 2, Table S2, http://links.lww.com/DSS/ B13). Excluding studies that reported occlusion time as range (n 5 9) and mean occlusion time of 3.53 (SD 5 1.99) and 6.11 (SD 5 5.79) hours were found for BD and SCC, respectively.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation