2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence of non-pulmonary vein foci in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing standard ablation of pulmonary vein isolation: Clinical characteristics and long-term ablation outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-PV foci induction from the LA was higher in the CB group than in the RF group, which may be reflected by the potentially larger isolation area of the LA in RF ablation (PVI plus LA posterior isolation) [7] . Generally, non-PV triggers were observed in 10%–30% of PAF patients, more frequently in non-PAF, female patients, or patients with low BMI [6] , [16] , [27] , [28] . In this study, patients who were induced non-PV triggers after PVI and performed additional non-PV ablation have a higher atrial tachycardia recurrence rate than those without induced non-PV triggers ( Table4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The non-PV foci induction from the LA was higher in the CB group than in the RF group, which may be reflected by the potentially larger isolation area of the LA in RF ablation (PVI plus LA posterior isolation) [7] . Generally, non-PV triggers were observed in 10%–30% of PAF patients, more frequently in non-PAF, female patients, or patients with low BMI [6] , [16] , [27] , [28] . In this study, patients who were induced non-PV triggers after PVI and performed additional non-PV ablation have a higher atrial tachycardia recurrence rate than those without induced non-PV triggers ( Table4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…influenced by the successful elimination of IRAF triggers. The importance of non-PV triggers has also been reported after catheter ablation [15,16]. Kurotobi et al [17] reported that the incidence of non-PV foci, number of non-PV foci, incidence of foci in the right atria, and incidence of multiple foci were significantly higher in persistent than in paroxysmal AF.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the first place, individuals studied were persistent AF patients while the present study employed exclusively paroxysmal AF patients. As persistent AF shows more complicated atrial substrate and often presents AF drivers outside of PVs, efficiency of CA of PVs is notably lower with respect to success rates in paroxysmal AF patients [ 19 , 80 ]. Secondly, the procedure consisted of CA of PVs, CA of CFAEs and linear CA of LA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the effect of CA on additional non-PV triggers remains quite controversial. Evidence shows that additional ablation of these sites offers little or no improved results with respect to single PVs ablation [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. It remains unclear, however, whether failure of additional CA applications to provide significant improvement in termination of AF stems from the incapacity of CA on sites other than PVs to terminate AF or from a vague and unclear definition of areas in need of ablation due to highly complex EGMs, thus highlighting the need for more reliable algorithms able to properly evaluate the atrial substrate [ 6 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%