Abstract. Biomass burning is an important environmental process
with a strong influence on vegetation and on the atmospheric composition. It
competes with microbes and herbivores to convert biomass to CO2 and it
is a major contributor of gases and aerosols to the atmosphere. To better
understand and predict global fire occurrence, fire models have been
developed and coupled to dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) and Earth
system models (ESMs). We present SEVER-FIRE v1.0 (Socio-Economic and natural Vegetation
ExpeRimental global fire model version 1.0), which is incorporated into the
SEVER DGVM. One of the major
focuses of SEVER-FIRE is an implementation of pyrogenic behavior of humans
(timing of their activities and their willingness and necessity to ignite or
suppress fire), related to socioeconomic and demographic conditions in a
geographical domain of the model application. Burned areas and emissions from
the SEVER model are compared to the Global Fire Emission Database version 2
(GFED), derived from satellite observations, while number of fires is
compared with regional historical fire statistics. We focus on both the model
output accuracy and its assumptions regarding fire drivers and perform (1) an
evaluation of the predicted spatial and temporal patterns, focusing on fire
incidence, seasonality and interannual variability; (2) analysis to evaluate
the assumptions concerning the etiology, or causation, of fire, including
climatic and anthropogenic drivers, as well as the type and amount of
vegetation. SEVER reproduces the main features of climate-driven interannual fire
variability at a regional scale, for example the large fires associated with the
1997–1998 El Niño event in Indonesia and Central and South America, which had
critical ecological and atmospheric impacts. Spatial and seasonal patterns
of fire incidence reveal some model inaccuracies, and we discuss the
implications of the distribution of vegetation types inferred by the DGVM
and of assumed proxies of human fire practices. We further suggest possible
development directions to enable such models to better project future fire
activity.