2022
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present in class yet absent in science: The individual and societal impact of inequitable science instruction and challenge to improve science instruction

Abstract: Current science instruction does not educate K‐12 students equitably and creates short‐ and long‐term impacts on individual students and society. While students may be present in class, they may not have access to quality science learning experiences. The goals of this paper are to show how science instruction may not be reaching its aim of equitable access and to offer recommendations for creating a new baseline standard for equitable science instruction. Though not exhaustive, this paper identifies groups of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Access to resources is a critical component of achievement, yet the availability of high-quality schools too often depends on income. 214–217 Access to institutions builds peer networks, thus poverty of opportunity is strongly influenced by race 157,218–223 as a consequence of the racial wealth gap. 224–229 This legacy affects the preparation of junior scholars, which warrants consideration as we address how merit should be evaluated.…”
Section: Faculty Hiring: the Meritocracy Mythmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to resources is a critical component of achievement, yet the availability of high-quality schools too often depends on income. 214–217 Access to institutions builds peer networks, thus poverty of opportunity is strongly influenced by race 157,218–223 as a consequence of the racial wealth gap. 224–229 This legacy affects the preparation of junior scholars, which warrants consideration as we address how merit should be evaluated.…”
Section: Faculty Hiring: the Meritocracy Mythmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To these I add the following:
Student access to the subject matter : As Jones and Burrell (2022) argue, it is unfortunately all too common for students to be excluded from the types of teacher‐student interactions that are necessary for science learning. An appropriate conception of teaching ought to include proactive advocacy for access to learning for all students, including the use of universal design principles for learning (Meyer et al, 2016).
…”
Section: A Revised Conception Of Teaching Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framing essay, I take up the instruction theme for this special issue by examining the barriers to good science teaching that exist both within and beyond the relationship between instructor and learner, a topic also taken up by the other two articles in this section. Jones and Burrell's (2022) article, “Present in Class Yet Absent in Science: The Individual and Societal Impact of Inequitable Science Instruction and Charge to Improve Science Instruction” examines the various ways in which specific groups of students are “left out” by science education. Jones and Taylor's (2022) article “Within the Walls of the Classroom: How Science Teachers’ Instruction Can Develop Students’ Sociopolitical Consciousness” presents both an argument and strategies for developing students sociopolitical consciousness within science instruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students are less interested in learning science and less motivated by science subjects. These things are due to traditional learning concepts that teachers still apply, so students do not become smart and fast in learning (Haleem et al, 2022;Jones & Burrell, 2022;Stuckey et al, 2013). Inappropriate science learning produces gaps and creates poor learning outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%