2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present of a causal model for social function based on theory of mind with mediating of Machiavellian beliefs and hot empathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, AMS-Q reflects real life, in which few social situations are neutral and the ability to grasp the intentions, beliefs, desires, and emotions of others can be used in prosocial or antisocial ways. Indeed, people consistently use their mind-reading abilities to understand and even control another’s behavior by manipulating, teasing, or other antisocial purposes ( Arefi, 2010 ). Likewise, mentalizing abilities can offer help and cooperation, care about others, and consider their feelings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, AMS-Q reflects real life, in which few social situations are neutral and the ability to grasp the intentions, beliefs, desires, and emotions of others can be used in prosocial or antisocial ways. Indeed, people consistently use their mind-reading abilities to understand and even control another’s behavior by manipulating, teasing, or other antisocial purposes ( Arefi, 2010 ). Likewise, mentalizing abilities can offer help and cooperation, care about others, and consider their feelings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, nearly all children and adults consistently use their mind-reading skills for everyday social purposes. In this sense, the nature of social behaviors is rarely neutral and more often are behaviors that require prosocial or antisocial use of ToM skills ( Ronald et al, 2005 ; Arefi, 2010 ). For these reasons, Ronald et al (2005) proposed the expressions nice Theory of Mind and nasty Theory of Mind to distinguish prosocial and antisocial ToM abilities ( Happé and Frith, 1996 ), identifying nice ToM in behaviors such as cooperating, comforting, considering others’ feelings, and nasty ToM, which involves an intact mentalizing ability but used to manipulate, outwit, or tease others ( Happé and Frith, 1996 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Consistent with this, subjects with Machiavellian beliefs have also been found to exhibit a kind of affective coldness without empathic concern and take advantage of their ToM abilities as a social tool they use according to their own convenience. [35][36][37] This may partially explain why mean Faux Pas Test scores were similar in both groups of adolescents, and suggests the CUTs of adolescents with CD can be a contributing factor to the instrumental use of their ToM abilities. This operational use of mind-reading abilities should be further explored both in healthy controls and in subjects with CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ToM skills may be helpful in concealing the antisocial child’s true intentions and goals by making the behavior appear inoffensive or at least ambiguous to others (Renouf et al, 2010). Thus, ToM can be used to engage both prosocial and antisocial or Machiavellian behaviors (Arefi, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%