1971
DOI: 10.2172/4717933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present status of the analyses of the first and second spectra of uranium (U I and U II) as derived from measurements of optical spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, as Figure 2 demonstrates, an intense transition of UO occurred at the same energy and overlaid the UF band, thus preventing the recording of a clean high-resolution LIF spectrum of UF in this region. Consequently, only a lower-resolution REMPI spectrum was recorded for this transition, which 36 f These states belong to 5f 3 7s6dδ ion core. Figure 3 was collected with the ScanMate Pro laser tuned to the Q-branch of [18.6]3.5-X(1)4.5 transition.…”
Section: ■ Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, as Figure 2 demonstrates, an intense transition of UO occurred at the same energy and overlaid the UF band, thus preventing the recording of a clean high-resolution LIF spectrum of UF in this region. Consequently, only a lower-resolution REMPI spectrum was recorded for this transition, which 36 f These states belong to 5f 3 7s6dδ ion core. Figure 3 was collected with the ScanMate Pro laser tuned to the Q-branch of [18.6]3.5-X(1)4.5 transition.…”
Section: ■ Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their critical compilation related to actinides, Blaise & Wyart (1992) listed some preliminary U II energy levels, using the emission lines listed by Steinhaus et al (1971) and Palmer, Keller & Engleman (1980), thus updating the previous estimates published by Brewer (1971). An uranium hollow-cathode Fourier transform spectrum between 1800 and 42 000cm −1 was then combined with previous visible and ultraviolet spectra by Blaise et al (1994) who were able to determine the numerical values for 354 and 809 energy levels belonging to the four odd configurations 5f 3 7s 2 , 5f 3 6d7s, 5f 3 6d 2 , 5f 4 7p, and to the six even configurations 5f 4 7s, 5f 4 6d, 5f 2 6d 2 7s, 5f 2 6d7s 2 , 5f 3 7s7p, 5f 3 6d7p, respectively.…”
Section: Ava I L a B L E Ato M I C Data I N U Iimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility for correcting the J-value for E exp = 13,695.737 was thus examined. Indeed, while a J = 11/2 attribution can be justified by only one unique transition with a J = 13/2 even level, a J = 9/2 value is supported by 16 lines of [7] and by two unidentified lines from the infrared line list of [14] that fit transitions with J = 7/2 even levels. Table 4 collects the transitions supporting the present assignation of a J = 9/2 for this level.…”
Section: Odd Parity Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…wl Ritz : Ritz wavelength calculated with experimental energies from [6]; wl exp : experimental wavelength ; ∆wl = wl exp − wl Ritz ; wn exp : experimental wavenumbers; ∆wn = wn exp −(E even − E odd ). LA: line already assigned as U II transition in [7], as: asymmetrical line, c: complex line shape, p: line resolved on the plate, but perturbed by a close line, b: broad line, ? : line given by [12] as U III without classification, IV : this line could be blended with a strong U IV line, D: line with double identification, T: line with triple identification, #n: line number in Figure 1.…”
Section: Classified Lines Of U II In the Ultravioletmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation