1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1116(09)70083-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present thoughts on the aquatic countermeasures applied to regions of the Dnieper river catchment contaminated by the 1986 Chernobyl accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radiocesium concentration indicates a decreasing trend with increasing time after the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident. Similar variation was reported for the Dnieper River in Chernobyl [14]. However, higher radioactivity was also observed in the Niida River in March, June, and September 2012 after rain events.…”
Section: Radioactivity Of 134 Cs and 137 Cssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The radiocesium concentration indicates a decreasing trend with increasing time after the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident. Similar variation was reported for the Dnieper River in Chernobyl [14]. However, higher radioactivity was also observed in the Niida River in March, June, and September 2012 after rain events.…”
Section: Radioactivity Of 134 Cs and 137 Cssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…One option is to operate the Ogaki Dam in a way to buffer contamination in the reservoir. Such reservoir management was previously attempted at the Kiev Reservoir on the Dnieper River after the Chernobyl accident (Voitsekhovitch et al 1997). Here, we report numerical simulations of sand, silt, and clay transport in the Ogaki Dam Reservoir to achieve this goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Countermeasures may be grouped into two categories: those aimed at reducing doses from radioactivity in drinking water and those aimed at reducing doses from consumption of aquatic foodstuffs, principally freshwater fish. In the context of an atmospheric fallout of radioactivity to both terrestrial and aquatic systems, it has been shown (Voitsekhovitch, Nasvit, Los'y & Berkovski, 1997;Stone, Smith, Jackson & Ibbotson, 1997) that doses from terrestrial foodstuffs are in general more significant than doses from drinking water and aquatic foodstuffs. Measures to reduce doses via drinking water may, however, be required, particularly in the short-term (timescale, weeks) after a fallout when activity concentrations in surface waters are relatively high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%