2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2020.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presentation and Follow-up of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Differences Between APC and MUTYH Mutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 30 Since the phenotype of MAP overlaps with FAP yet cancer risk management differs, it is important to confirm the underlying molecular diagnosis in an individual presenting with colonic polyposis and/or early onset colon cancer. 81 Additionally, risk estimation for relatives is also impacted depending on whether the polyposis syndrome is inherited in a recessive (eg, MAP) versus dominant (eg, FAP/AFAP) manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 30 Since the phenotype of MAP overlaps with FAP yet cancer risk management differs, it is important to confirm the underlying molecular diagnosis in an individual presenting with colonic polyposis and/or early onset colon cancer. 81 Additionally, risk estimation for relatives is also impacted depending on whether the polyposis syndrome is inherited in a recessive (eg, MAP) versus dominant (eg, FAP/AFAP) manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 , 41 , 87 For ACG and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, the recommended age of initiation is slightly earlier at 25–30 years of age, consistent with FAP surveillance, despite the reduced penetrance for duodenal neoplasia with MAP. 42 , 81 , 85 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%