1989
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9924(89)90016-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presentation level determination for CV tokens using a computer-controlled adaptive procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is less common to use monosyllabic words, or closed-set phoneme materials, within adaptive SRT procedures, previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of such methods (Tecca and Binnie, 1982;Mackie and Dermody, 1986;Wall et al, 1989;Liu and Eddins, 2012). Three separate measures of SRT were obtained for each processing strategy and each target stimulus set (consonant and vowel) by using three adaptive rules (described below) that converged to 70.7%, 50%, and 29.3% correct speech reception.…”
Section: E Speech Reception Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is less common to use monosyllabic words, or closed-set phoneme materials, within adaptive SRT procedures, previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of such methods (Tecca and Binnie, 1982;Mackie and Dermody, 1986;Wall et al, 1989;Liu and Eddins, 2012). Three separate measures of SRT were obtained for each processing strategy and each target stimulus set (consonant and vowel) by using three adaptive rules (described below) that converged to 70.7%, 50%, and 29.3% correct speech reception.…”
Section: E Speech Reception Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%