Presenteeism

Brooks, Ambyr; Hagen, Susan E.; Sathyanarayanan, Sudhakar; Schultz, Alyssa B.; Edington, Dee W.

doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e3181f475cc

Cited by 121 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 100 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There has been some concern in the literature that of the more than 14 scales currently designed to measure presenteeism, many may not be measuring the same construct. 22 This concern may have been illustrated in the present study through the responses of participant 4. Had participant 4 only filled out the WPAI-SHP, no problems would have been reported.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Workplace Productivity and Voice Disorders: A Cognitive Interviewing Study on Presenteeism in Individuals With Spasmodic Dysphonia

Isetti

Meyer

2014

Journal of Voice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Workplace Productivity and Voice Disorders: A Cognitive Interviewing Study on Presenteeism in Individuals With Spasmodic Dysphonia

Isetti

Meyer

2014

Journal of Voice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Given a positive skew, the WLQ data were square-root transformed. Reviews, commentary, and limited validity evidence pertinent to these and similar self-report scales can be found in several additional sources (e.g., Amick, Lerner, Rogers, Rooney, & Katz, 2000;Brooks et al, 2010;Lofland, Pizzi, & Frick, 2004;Prasad, Wahlqvist, Shikiar, & Shih, 2004;Sanderson et al, 2007;Schultz & Edington, 2007;Tang, Pitts, Solway, & Beaton, 2009;Turpin et al, 2004). Both measures were subjected to common factor analyses with oblique rotation, as suggested by Bandalos and Boehm-Kaufman (2009).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, two prominent measures of productivity loss when present were used. Given the existence of at least 14 of these instruments, such comparisons are vital yet rare (Brooks, Hagen, Sathyanarayanan, Schultz, & Edington, 2010).…”

Section: Work Experiencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Attendance dynamics at work: The antecedents and correlates of presenteeism, absenteeism, and productivity loss.

Johns¹

2011

Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

257

269

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Presenteeism is attending work when ill. This study examined the antecedents and correlates of presenteeism, absenteeism, and productivity loss attributed to presenteeism. Predictors included work context, personal characteristics, and work experiences. Business school graduates employed in a variety of work positions (N = 444) completed a Web-based survey. Presenteeism was positively associated with task significance, task interdependence, ease of replacement, and work to family conflict and negatively associated with neuroticism, equity, job security, internal health locus of control, and the perceived legitimacy of absence. Absenteeism was positively related to task significance, perceived absence legitimacy, and family to work conflict and negatively related to task interdependence and work to family conflict. Those high on neuroticism, the unconscientious, the job-insecure, those who viewed absence as more legitimate, and those experiencing work-family conflict reported more productivity loss. Overall, the results reveal the value of a behavioral approach to presenteeism over and above a strict medical model. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).

show abstract

“…Absenteeism will be calculated, and reduced work productivity (presenteeism) will be measured by the Quantity and Quality instrument (QQ). The amount and quality of productivity will be measured on a 10-point numerical rating scale, with 0 representing "nothing" and "very poor quality," respectively, and 10 representing "normal quantity" and "normal quality," respectively [42,43]. …”

Section: Intervention Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The respondent will be asked to quantify how much work was actually performed during regular hours and the quality of this work as compared with a normal work day [42,43]. …”

Section: Intervention Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study protocol of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a biopsychosocial multidisciplinary intervention in the evolution of non-specific sub-acute low back pain in the working population: cluster randomised trial

Berenguera

Pujol‐Ribera

Rodríguez-Blanco

et al. 2011

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundLow back pain (LBP), with high incidence and prevalence rate, is one of the most common reasons to consult the health system and is responsible for a significant amount of sick leave, leading to high health and social costs. The objective of the study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial educational group intervention (MBEGI) of non-specific sub-acute LBP in comparison with the usual care in the working population recruited in primary healthcare centres.Methods/designThe study design is a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a MBEGI in comparison with the usual care of non-specific sub-acute LBP.Measures on effectiveness and costs of both interventions will be obtained from a cluster randomised controlled clinical trial carried out in 38 Catalan primary health care centres, enrolling 932 patients between 18 and 65 years old with a diagnosis of non-specific sub-acute LBP. Effectiveness measures are: pharmaceutical treatments, work sick leave (% and duration in days), Roland Morris disability, McGill pain intensity, Fear Avoidance Beliefs (FAB) and Golberg Questionnaires. Utility measures will be calculated from the SF-12. The analysis will be performed from a social perspective. The temporal horizon is at 3 months (change to chronic LBP) and 12 months (evaluate the outcomes at long term).Assessment of outcomes will be blinded and will follow the intention-to-treat principle.DiscussionWe hope to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of MBEGI, see an improvement in the patients' quality of life, achieve a reduction in the duration of episodes and the chronicity of non-specific low back pain, and be able to report a decrease in the social costs. If the intervention is cost-effectiveness and cost-utility, it could be applied to Primary Health Care Centres.Trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN58719694

show abstract

Presenteeism

Abstract: Many aspects of presenteeism still warrant caution, especially when using presenteeism measurements to quantify economic outcomes. Focusing on productivity at the population level, rather than the individual level, may be more appropriate.

Cited by 121 publications

References 100 publications

Workplace Productivity and Voice Disorders: A Cognitive Interviewing Study on Presenteeism in Individuals With Spasmodic Dysphonia

Workplace Productivity and Voice Disorders: A Cognitive Interviewing Study on Presenteeism in Individuals With Spasmodic Dysphonia

Attendance dynamics at work: The antecedents and correlates of presenteeism, absenteeism, and productivity loss.

Study protocol of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a biopsychosocial multidisciplinary intervention in the evolution of non-specific sub-acute low back pain in the working population: cluster randomised trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About