2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presenting new collaborative link prediction methods for activity recommendation in Facebook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose is to identify unobserved edges in the existing network or forecast future edges based on the current network structure [1]. Link prediction has been applied to recommend friends or interest points in social networks [2], predict the possible protein interactions without costly experiments in biology [3], simulate the drug interactions through a limited number of tests in medical pharmacy [4], and analyze the structure of criminal and terrorist networks to combat organized crime [5]. The existing methods for link prediction are either based on similarity or grounded on probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose is to identify unobserved edges in the existing network or forecast future edges based on the current network structure [1]. Link prediction has been applied to recommend friends or interest points in social networks [2], predict the possible protein interactions without costly experiments in biology [3], simulate the drug interactions through a limited number of tests in medical pharmacy [4], and analyze the structure of criminal and terrorist networks to combat organized crime [5]. The existing methods for link prediction are either based on similarity or grounded on probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity-based methods [2] assume that two nodes with a high similarity are more likely to be edged, and characterize the similarity between different nodes by local and global indices. The common indices include common neighbors (CN) index [6], adamic-adar (AA) index [7], local path (LP) index [8], and resource allocation (RA) index [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os trabalhos que apresentam metodologias detalhadas foram aplicados em diversas áreas do conhecimento como por exemplo, sistemas de suporte à decisão (HONG et al, 2018;MINELGA et al, 2017;GAO et al, 2017a;, pesquisas relacionadas a mineração de dados nas nuvens e com dados oriundos da web (SHEU, 2018;ZHANG et al, 2018;SLAIMI et al, 2017;SHAHMOHAMMADI;KHADANGI;BAGHERI, 2016;LI-XIONG et al, 2015) SU, 2017;GAO et al, 2017a;MAKINO;KATO;TANIMOTO, 2017;XING, 2016;SHEN, 2016;RUSH et al, 2016;CARVALHO;REZENDE, 2016;SIMARD;ST-PIERRE;BISKRI, 2016;ZHENWEI;LINGYUN;LIZHU, 2016;WILKE et al, 2016;USMAN;USMAN, 2016;DU et al, 2015;YANG, 2015;LI-XIONG et al, 2015;CARVALHO, 2014;BARALIS et al, 2013;DING et al, 2013;PETELIN et al, 2013;GAMA;FERREIRA, 2012). Para extração das regras, os Grafos foram utilizados como estruturas de apoio para que os itemsets fossem formados e as medidas de suporte e confiança calculados.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Nas tarefas de análise exploratória vários tipos de Redes foram utilizadas, bem como a forma na qual cada uma delas se apresentou ANAND;VINODCHANDRA, 2018;SU, 2017;Özgür Cingiz;BIRICIK;DIRI, 2017;KIM et al, 2017;INDHUMATHY;NABHAN;ARUMUGAM, 2017;CAI et al, 2017;NAMAKI et al, 2017;SHA, 2017;ADARICHEVA;NATION, 2017;SHIN, 2017;GAO et al, 2017b;SHAHMOHAMMADI;KHADANGI;BAGHERI, 2016;BELYI et al, 2016;SHEN, 2016;XU, 2016;WILKE et al, 2016;DASGUPTA;SAHA, 2016;RAWAT et al, 2016;ABAY;MUTLU;KARAGOZ, 2016;DU et al, 2015;YANG, 2015;HENDRICKX et al, 2015;NADI et al, 2014;RANJAN;VAISH;COULL, 2014;ZHAI;PEDRYCZ, 2012;MORE et al, 2011;VEDULA;THATAVARTI, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation