2015
DOI: 10.1177/0272989x15584922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels

Abstract: Background Previous research demonstrated that providing (vs. not providing) numeric information about medications’ adverse effects (AEs) increased comprehension and willingness to use medication, but left open the question about which numeric format is best. Objective To determine which of four tested formats (percentage, frequency, percentage+risk label, frequency+risk label) maximizes comprehension and willingness to use medication across age and numeracy levels. Design In a cross-sectional internet sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation of our research is that our sample was relatively well‐educated, as compared with the U.K. population. As a result, the range of numeracy scores may have been restricted, thus limiting our ability to uncover correlations of numeracy with, say, age (see also Sinayev et al, ). Other studies with relatively educated samples have also found no significant correlation between numeracy and age (Bruine de Bruin et al, ; Låg et al, ; McNair et al, in press; Sinayev et al, ; Weller et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of our research is that our sample was relatively well‐educated, as compared with the U.K. population. As a result, the range of numeracy scores may have been restricted, thus limiting our ability to uncover correlations of numeracy with, say, age (see also Sinayev et al, ). Other studies with relatively educated samples have also found no significant correlation between numeracy and age (Bruine de Bruin et al, ; Låg et al, ; McNair et al, in press; Sinayev et al, ; Weller et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also disclosed genetic ( HLA-DRB1 ) and autoantibody (RF/CCP) results. Furthermore, it combined risk factors and disclosed personalized risk displayed as both relative risk and absolute lifetime RA risk estimates to provide several formats for displaying numeric results (24). The methods and primary literature for relative risks and population prevalence of each RA risk factor that were components of the PRE-RA tool were reported in detail in a previous publication (21).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In medical decision making research there is some evidence that percentage formats increase comprehension (and decrease perceived risk) as compared to frequency formats (Sinayev et al, 2015). As far as we know, no previous studies have been published that measure the effect of a quantitative (pension) income frame on perceived pension income adequacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on framing effects of the quantitative format finds that percentage formats, such as "x percent of patients experience side effects" increase comprehension (and decrease perceived risk) as compared to frequency formats, such as "y out of z patients experience side effects" (Sinayev et al, 2015). Moreover, a low probability event is perceived as more likely if it is quantitatively presented as a ratio with large numbers, for instance 20/100, as compared to an equivalent ratio expressed with smaller numbers, like 2/10 ( Kirkpatrick & Epstein, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%