1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002270050444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preservation and incubation time-induced bias in tracer-aided grazing studies on meiofauna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nematodes contributed negligibly to benthic carbon mineralization in our study, with considerably less than 0.1% of the processed 13 C showing up in nematode biomass at any given time, in agreement with Moodley et al (2002). Even if we take into account that this represents assimilation rather than uptake, and that assimilation is underestimated because of (1) leakage of low-molecular weight material from frozen and thawed specimens (Moens et al 1999), and (2) (unknown) carbon turnover times in nematode tissues, nematodes contributed less than 1% to the recorded benthic carbon mineralization. While several authors have suggested a quantitative importance of meiofauna in benthic carbon and energy flows (a.o.…”
Section: Pulse-chase Experimentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Nematodes contributed negligibly to benthic carbon mineralization in our study, with considerably less than 0.1% of the processed 13 C showing up in nematode biomass at any given time, in agreement with Moodley et al (2002). Even if we take into account that this represents assimilation rather than uptake, and that assimilation is underestimated because of (1) leakage of low-molecular weight material from frozen and thawed specimens (Moens et al 1999), and (2) (unknown) carbon turnover times in nematode tissues, nematodes contributed less than 1% to the recorded benthic carbon mineralization. While several authors have suggested a quantitative importance of meiofauna in benthic carbon and energy flows (a.o.…”
Section: Pulse-chase Experimentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Differences between nematode C uptake in the aforementioned studies possibly arise due to differences in the organic substrates added (see Ingels et al 2010). They may also be attributable to differences in sample processing techniques (e.g Moens et al 1999), as well as the structure and functional diversity of nematode communities. It is apparent that the lack of knowledge on the life cycles, energy requirements, and food preferences of deep-sea nematodes has so far hampered the full exploitation of stable isotope labelling techniques in understanding the role of these organisms in deep-sea C cycling.…”
Section: Community Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, one should be aware that freezing of samples may result in leakage of label after thawing as was illustrated for cladocerans (Mourelatos et al 1992) and nematodes (Moens et al 1999). As suggested in both studies, sorting of organisms was done within 2 h of thawing in the present study to minimise possible leakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diatom uptake expressed as (A) δ 13 C, (B) total uptake per individual relative to individual biomass and (C) total uptake per unit carbon of copepod. High density corresponds to 4 times the low density it might give inaccurate estimates of overall grazing rates in the field (Moens et al 1999). A combination of natural-abundance isotope surveys and isotopeaddition experiments appears to be a powerful approach for investigating both average patterns and interspecific variability in resource exploitation (Carman & Fry 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%