Preservation of Human Creativity in Plastic Surgery Research on ChatGPT

Abi‐Rafeh, Jad; Xu, Hong Hao; Kazan, Roy

doi:10.1093/asj/sjad162

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…32 In plastic surgery, ChatGPT has found applications in systematic reviews, virtual consultations, preoperative planning, and patient education. [33][34][35][36] Our study demonstrated ChatGPT's ability to provide a broad qualitative prediction with approximately 91% accuracy in survey questions, showcasing its potential to analyze extensive datasets and offer insightful predictions. However, challenges exist, and ChatGPT lacks medical specialization, which can lead to inaccuracies and ethical concerns.…”

Section: Chatgpt Survey Predictionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: Insights from Plastic Surgeons, Education Integration, ChatGPT’s Survey Predictions, and the Path Forward

Farid,

Fernando Botero Gutierrez,

Ortiz

et al. 2024

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative technology with potential applications in various plastic surgery procedures and plastic surgery education. This article examines the views of plastic surgeons and residents on the role of AI in the field of plastic surgery. Methods: A 34-question survey on AI’s role in plastic surgery was distributed to 564 plastic surgeons worldwide, and we received responses from 153 (26.77%) with the majority from Latin America. The survey explored various aspects such as current AI experience, attitudes toward AI, data sources, ethical considerations, and future prospects of AI in plastic surgery and education. Predictions from AI using ChatGPT for each question were compared with the actual survey responses. Results: The study found that most participants had little or no prior AI experience. Although some believed AI could enhance accuracy and visualization, opinions on its impact on surgical time, patient recovery, and satisfaction were mixed. Concerns included patient privacy, data security, costs, and informed consent. Valuable AI training data sources were identified, and there was agreement on the importance of standards and transparency. Respondents expected AI’s increasing role in reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, suggesting its integration into residency programs, addressing administrative challenges, and patient complications. Confidence in the enduring importance of human professionals was expressed, with interest in further AI research. Conclusion: The survey’s findings underscore the need to harness AI’s potential while preserving human professionals’ roles through informed consent, standardization, and AI education in plastic surgery.

show abstract

Section: Chatgpt Survey Predictionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: Insights from Plastic Surgeons, Education Integration, ChatGPT’s Survey Predictions, and the Path Forward

Farid,

Fernando Botero Gutierrez,

Ortiz

et al. 2024

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…29,31,33,34,35,36 On the other hand, some authors express reservations about the use of artificial intelligence, fearing that it may diminish human creativity, which forms the foundation of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 14,34,39,46…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4 Furthermore, GPT-4's responses were found to be superficial and inadequate when addressing complex questions. 11,25,27,39,40 Authors have labelled that this language model is not specialized for medicine as it responds to harmful commands and tends to produce repetitive content 4 , and they strongly recommend that every information should be verified by a professional plastic surgeon. 4,26,27,37,40 Therefore, ChatGPT can only serve as a supplementary tool for cosmetic consultations 27,43 rather than a replacement for human decision-making 8 or as an author for research paper writing.…”

Section: Limitations Of Chatgptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the application of CHATGPT in plastic surgery: a comprehensive systematic review

Fizzah Arif,

Mohammad Khozema Safri,

Zenab Shahzad

et al. 2024

J Pak Med Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine the impact of ChatGPT in plasticsurgery research and assess the authenticity of such contributions. Methods: The study conducted a literature search inSep’23 from databases like Pubmed, Google Scholar,SCOPUS, and OVID Medline.The following keywords‘ChatGPT’, ‘chatbot’, ‘reconstruction’, ‘aesthetic’ and‘plastic surgery’ were used. 32 papers were included fromthe initial 131 results of articles. English language articlesfrom November 2022 to July 2023 discussing ChatGPT'srole in plastic and aesthetic surgery were includedwhereas non-English documents, irrelevant content, andnon-academic sources were excluded from the study. Results: The manuscripts included in the systematicreview had a diverse range, including original researcharticles, case reports, letters to the editor, and editorials.Among the included studies, there were 9 originalresearch articles, 1 case report, 23 letters to the editor, and2 editorials. Most publications originated from the UnitedStates (18) and Australia (7). Analysis suggested concerns,such as inaccuracies, plagiarism, outdated knowledge,and lack of personalized advice. Various authorsrecommend using ChatGPT as a supplementary toolrather than a replacement for human decision-making inmedicine. Conclusion: ChatGPT shows potential in plastic surgeryresearch, concerns about inaccuracies and outdatedknowledge may provide deceiving information and italways requires human input and verification.Keywords: Plastic, ChatGPT, Reconstructive Surgery,Aesthetic Surgery, Chatbot. Keywords: Plastic, ChatGPT, Reconstructive Surgery, Aesthetic Surgery, Chatbot.

show abstract

“…Initially, it can assist healthcare practitioners in diagnosing medical conditions by examining patient symptoms, medical history, and other relevant data, leading to faster and more accurate diagnoses. Additionally, ChatGPT can contribute to the synthesis and analysis of extensive medical literature, ultimately possibly resulting in the identification of new treatments, medications, or a deeper comprehension of diseases [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Further, ChatGPT has the potential to serve as an additional educational resource for medical students and professionals by offering explanations, responding to queries, and assisting in the revision of medical concepts [9,10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy and Completeness of ChatGPT-Generated Information on Interceptive Orthodontics: A Multicenter Collaborative Study

Hatia,

Doldo,

Parrini

et al. 2024

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: this study aims to investigate the accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT in answering questions and solving clinical scenarios of interceptive orthodontics. Materials and Methods: ten specialized orthodontists from ten Italian postgraduate orthodontics schools developed 21 clinical open-ended questions encompassing all of the subspecialities of interceptive orthodontics and 7 comprehensive clinical cases. Questions and scenarios were inputted into ChatGPT4, and the resulting answers were evaluated by the researchers using predefined accuracy (range 1–6) and completeness (range 1–3) Likert scales. Results: For the open-ended questions, the overall median score was 4.9/6 for the accuracy and 2.4/3 for completeness. In addition, the reviewers rated the accuracy of open-ended answers as entirely correct (score 6 on Likert scale) in 40.5% of cases and completeness as entirely correct (score 3 n Likert scale) in 50.5% of cases. As for the clinical cases, the overall median score was 4.9/6 for accuracy and 2.5/3 for completeness. Overall, the reviewers rated the accuracy of clinical case answers as entirely correct in 46% of cases and the completeness of clinical case answers as entirely correct in 54.3% of cases. Conclusions: The results showed a high level of accuracy and completeness in AI responses and a great ability to solve difficult clinical cases, but the answers were not 100% accurate and complete. ChatGPT is not yet sophisticated enough to replace the intellectual work of human beings.

show abstract

Preservation of Human Creativity in Plastic Surgery Research on ChatGPT

Cited by 11 publications

References 7 publications

Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: Insights from Plastic Surgeons, Education Integration, ChatGPT’s Survey Predictions, and the Path Forward

Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: Insights from Plastic Surgeons, Education Integration, ChatGPT’s Survey Predictions, and the Path Forward

Exploring the application of CHATGPT in plastic surgery: a comprehensive systematic review

Accuracy and Completeness of ChatGPT-Generated Information on Interceptive Orthodontics: A Multicenter Collaborative Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About