2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-006-0484-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preservation of iced refrigerated sea bream (Sparus aurata) by irradiation: microbiological, chemical and sensory attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
21
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were determined in muscle at day 0 and 3 (Grigorakis et al 2003) or in skin at day 1 (Drosinos and Nychas 1996) of ungutted sea bream stored in ice. However, other authors have reported higher results in the initial values of TVCs in muscle of ungutted sea bream Lougovois et al 2003;Kilinc et al 2007;Özden et al 2007), sea bream fillets (Erkan and Uretener 2010) and in ungutted sea bass (Papadopoulos et al 2003) or in skin of whole sea bream Erkan 2007). These differences observed on TVCs could be due to the microbiological conditions of the fish muscle in ungutted sea bream, which are directly related to fishing ground, sanitary conditions of the slaughterhouse and environmental factors (Ward and Baj 1988).…”
Section: Descriptive Microbiological Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were determined in muscle at day 0 and 3 (Grigorakis et al 2003) or in skin at day 1 (Drosinos and Nychas 1996) of ungutted sea bream stored in ice. However, other authors have reported higher results in the initial values of TVCs in muscle of ungutted sea bream Lougovois et al 2003;Kilinc et al 2007;Özden et al 2007), sea bream fillets (Erkan and Uretener 2010) and in ungutted sea bass (Papadopoulos et al 2003) or in skin of whole sea bream Erkan 2007). These differences observed on TVCs could be due to the microbiological conditions of the fish muscle in ungutted sea bream, which are directly related to fishing ground, sanitary conditions of the slaughterhouse and environmental factors (Ward and Baj 1988).…”
Section: Descriptive Microbiological Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Other authors have reported similar results for Pseudomonas sp. and S. putrefaciens counts in muscle of sea bream, ranging from 6 to 7.8 log CFU/g (López-Caballero et al 2002;Lougovois et al 2003;Özden et al 2007); sea bass with 7-7.2 log CFU/g (Pseudomonas sp.) and 6.6 and 7 log CFU/g (S. putrefaciens) (Papadopoulos et al 2003;Paleologos et al 2004); as well as in sardines after 9 days of ice storage reached 4 and 4.9 log CFU/g, respectively (Erkan and Özden 2008), horse mackerel, with 6.42 and 5.12 log CFU/g after 12 days of ice storage (Tzikas et al 2007) and in sea bream skin, where was reported 6.7 log CFU/g after 13 days of ice storage for H 2 S-producing bacteria counts (Erkan 2007).…”
Section: S Putrefaciens Pseudomonas Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other authors have reported higher results in the initial values of mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria in muscle of ungutted sea bream Lougovois et al, 2003;Kilinc et al, 2007;Özden et al, 2007), sea bream fillets (Erkan and Ueretener, 2010), and ungutted sea bass (Papadopoulos et al, 2003) or in skin of whole sea bream Erkan, 2007). The differences observed in mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria between the different studies may have been due to the microbiological conditions of fish muscle in ungutted sea bream, directly related to fishing ground, sanitary conditions of the slaughterhouse, and environmental factors (Ward and Baj, 1988).…”
Section: Descriptive Microbiological Analysismentioning
confidence: 85%
“…putrefaciens counts in muscle of sea bream, ranging from 6-7.8 log CFU/g (López-Caballero et Lougovois et al, 2003;Özden et al, 2007), sea bass, with 7-7.2 log CFU/g (Pseudomonas spp. ), and 6.6 and 7 log CFU/g (S. putrefaciens) (Papadopoulos et al, 2003;Paleologos et al, 2004), as well as in sardines with values of 4 and 4.9 log CFU/g, respectively, after 9 days of storage (Erkan, 2008), horse mackerel with values of 6.42 and 5.12 log CFU/g, respectively, after 12 days of ice storage (Tzikas et al, 2007), and sea bream skin with 6.7 log CFU/g after 13 days of ice storage for H 2 S-producing bacteria counts (Erkan, 2007).…”
Section: (2009) Other Authors Described Higher Initial Counts Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation