Preservative-free influenza vaccine

Banzhoff, Angelika; Schwenke, Carsten; Febbraro, Salvatore

doi:10.1016/s0165-2478(99)00171-6

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified 60 eligible articles published between 1987 and 2006 describing inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine immunogenicity studies conducted in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, and Russia 10 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 . We included 129 independent study arms of which 119 reported data on response to A/H1N1, 109 on influenza B, and 108 on A/H3N2 vaccine strains (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We identified 60 eligible articles published between 1987 and 2006 describing inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine immunogenicity studies conducted in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, and Russia 10,22–80 . We included 129 independent study arms of which 119 reported data on response to A/H1N1, 109 on influenza B, and 108 on A/H3N2 vaccine strains (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines

Seidman

Richard

Viboud

et al. 2011

Influenza Resp Viruses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Please cite this paper as: Seidman et al. (2012) Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(1), 52–62. Background Seasonal influenza epidemics are associated with significant morbidity and mortality each year, particularly amongst young children and the elderly. Seasonal influenza vaccines have been available for decades, yet influenza remains a major public health threat in the US, sparking interest in studies evaluating the effectiveness of vaccination. Objectives We sought to identify determinants of serological responses to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines including number of doses, adjuvant, and subject characteristics. Methods We reviewed 60 articles published between 1987 and 2006. We used weighted multiple logistic regression and random‐effects models to evaluate how seroconversion and seroprotection rates varied with host and vaccine factors. Results Both children and seniors tended to have poorer immune responses compared to adults whereas use of adjuvant and a second vaccine dose tended to improve immune response. Pre‐vaccination serological status had a large impact on the immune response to vaccination. We found substantial heterogeneity among studies, even with similar population settings and vaccination regimen. Conclusions Future studies should stratify their results by pre‐vaccination serological status in an effort to produce more precise summary estimates of vaccine response.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We identified 60 eligible articles published between 1987 and 2006 describing inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine immunogenicity studies conducted in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, and Russia 10,22–80 . We included 129 independent study arms of which 119 reported data on response to A/H1N1, 109 on influenza B, and 108 on A/H3N2 vaccine strains (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines

Seidman

Richard

Viboud

et al. 2011

Influenza Resp Viruses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sera were prepared within the hour and stored at −70°C until hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers were analyzed as previously reported [11] for each of the three antigens [A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and B] at Novartis Vaccines, Clinical Serology Laboratory, Marburg, Germany. For confirmation purposes, immunogenicity results for all the strains were also analyzed using the Single Radial Hemolysis (SRH) assay.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Trivalent Surface Antigen Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Produced in Mammalian Cell Culture and Administered to Young and Elderly Adults with and without A(H1N1) Pre-Vaccination

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vaccination against influenza is an important means of reducing morbidity and mortality in subjects at risk. The prevalent viral strains responsible for seasonal epidemics usually change annually, but the WHO recommendations for the 2011/2012-season in the Northern hemisphere included the same antigens as for the previous season.We conducted a single-center, single-arm study involving 62 younger (18–60 years) and 64 older (>60 years) adults to test the immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of a trivalent surface antigen, inactivated influenza vaccine produced in mammalian cell-culture. The vaccine contained 15 µg hemagglutinin of each of the virus strains recommended for the 2011–2012 Northern hemisphere winter season (A/California/7/09 (H1N1)-; A/Perth/16/09 (H3N2)-; B/Brisbane/60/08-like strain) in a non-adjuvanted preservative-free formulation. Antibody response was measured by hemagglutination inhibition 21 days after immunization. Adverse events and safety were assessed using subject diary cards and telephone interviews.Seroconversion or a 4-fold antibody increase in antibody titers was detectable against A(H1N1) in 68% of both younger and older adults, against A(H3N2) in 53% and 27%, and against the B influenza strain in 35% and 17%. Antibody titers of 40 or more were observed against A(H1N1) in 87% and 90% of younger and older adults, against A(H3N2) in 98% and 98%, and against the B influenza strain in 93% and 90%. Pre-vaccination antibody titers were protective against A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and B in 38%, 58% and 58%, respectively, of younger and in 43%, 88% and 70% of older adults. Among subjects with previous A(H1N1) vaccination only 48% of younger and 47% of older adults had protective A(H1N1) antibodies at inclusion. Adverse reactions were generally mild. The most frequently reported reactions were pain at the injection site, myalgia and fatigue.The vaccine generated protective antibodies against all three viral strains and had an acceptable safety profile in both younger and older adults.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01422512

show abstract

Serum and mucosal immunologic responses in children following the administration of a new inactivated intranasal anti‐influenza vaccine*

Greenbaum

Furst²,

Kiderman³

et al. 2001

Journal of Medical Virology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Children are at considerable risk for influenza infection and may constitute the main vector for transmitting the virus to adults in the community. At present, the use of available vaccines in children is limited mainly because of a fear of side effects from the injection. Intranasal immunization was assessed as a painless, side effect-free method of facilitating the enrollment of children in vaccination programs. One intranasal dose of a trivalent inactive whole virus vaccine containing 20 microg of the three recommended seasonal viral strains was administered to 28 children recruited over two separate winter periods (1997/1998 and 1998/1999). No adverse effects were recorded. Serum IgG responses were determined by the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) method and nasal IgA responses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In both study period seasons, 77.7%-94.4% of children were found to be immune. There was a 3.7 x and 4.7 x increase in geometric mean titer (GMT) for A/H3N2 strains, 1.9 x and 3.9 x for A/H1N1 strains, and a 3.2 x and 1.7 x for B strains in 1997/1998 and 1998/1999, respectively. The increase in GMT, as well as fourfold increases in titer level, was higher when calculated among the nonimmune children prior to vaccination. Of these, 50%-87.5% became immune following immunization. Local antibody response to the three viral strains was detected in 50%-55% of the immunized children. Also, 83.3%, 73.3%, and 61.1% of the vaccinees exhibited a mucosal and/or serum antibody response to the A/Beijing, A/Sydney, and B/Harbin strains, respectively. This mucosal response may forestall influenza development in its early stages, thereby contributing significantly to the reduction of influenza spread in the community.

show abstract

Preservative-free influenza vaccine

Cited by 4 publications

References 20 publications

Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines

Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Trivalent Surface Antigen Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Produced in Mammalian Cell Culture and Administered to Young and Elderly Adults with and without A(H1N1) Pre-Vaccination

Serum and mucosal immunologic responses in children following the administration of a new inactivated intranasal anti‐influenza vaccine*

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About