2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0385-8146(01)00063-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserved otoacoustic emission in a child with a profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Though well-studied in adults due to its association with acoustic neuromas, the etiology of unilateral neural hearing loss remains poorly understood in children. To our knowledge, only 10 cases have been published, and etiology was rarely identified [18][19][20]. Therefore, we studied UNHL in children, testing our hypothesis that its etiologies are different from unilateral SNHL in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though well-studied in adults due to its association with acoustic neuromas, the etiology of unilateral neural hearing loss remains poorly understood in children. To our knowledge, only 10 cases have been published, and etiology was rarely identified [18][19][20]. Therefore, we studied UNHL in children, testing our hypothesis that its etiologies are different from unilateral SNHL in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANs are thought to usually present bilaterally, but recent studies suggest that some AN cases involve only one ear [24], accounting for less than 10 percent of all ANs. The causes of unilateral AN are still unclear; however, cochlear nerve deficiency, either partially (hypoplasia) or completely (aplasia or agenesis), has recently been recognized as a significant cause of SNHL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most ANs show bilateral presentation accompanied by typical audiological features, but recent studies suggest that some AN cases involve only one ear [24]. This kind of patients could easily be missing because of the present EOAE during the newborn hearing screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abnormal OAE was found in 10 ears without hearing loss, whereas it was normal in five ears with mild sensorineural‐type hearing loss (PTA 0.5–2 kHz 16.7–25 dB HL) and in one ear with conductive type hearing loss (PTA 0.5–2 kHz 30 dB HL). While normal OAE is known to be found in patients with degeneration in the acoustic nerve and preserved hair cells in the inner ear, pathological OAE in patients with normal hearing at audiometry may be caused by partly loss of hair cells in the inner ear and, therefore, predict future hearing loss [Brown and Dort, 2001; Ohwatari et al, 2001].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%