1995
DOI: 10.1137/s0036142993226983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserving and Increasing Local Edge-Connectivity in Mixed Graphs

Abstract: Generalizing and unifying earlier results of W. Mader and of the second and third authors, we prove two splitting theorems concerning mixed graphs. By invoking these theorems we obtain min-max formulae for the minimum number of new edges to be added to a mixed graph so that the resulting graph satis es local edgeconnectivity prescriptions. An extension of Edmonds' theorem on disjoint arborescences is also deduced along with a new su cient condition for the solvability of the edge-disjoint paths problem in digr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can build a tree T of cost O(L) such that the expected profit of the contracted nodes connected by T is in fact at least c∈C θ c · z * c which is in Ω(opt/ log n). This can be done by using results of Bang-Jensen et al [BJFJ95], which gives another way of obtaining a 2-approximation algorithm for Prize Collecting Steiner Tree (PCST). The result of Bang-Jensen et al [BJFJ95] implies that from x * we can build a convex combination of trees such that each client c appears in z * c fractional number of the trees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can build a tree T of cost O(L) such that the expected profit of the contracted nodes connected by T is in fact at least c∈C θ c · z * c which is in Ω(opt/ log n). This can be done by using results of Bang-Jensen et al [BJFJ95], which gives another way of obtaining a 2-approximation algorithm for Prize Collecting Steiner Tree (PCST). The result of Bang-Jensen et al [BJFJ95] implies that from x * we can build a convex combination of trees such that each client c appears in z * c fractional number of the trees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that for a skew-supermodular function p this is an (integer) contrapolymatroid (for details see [1]). In order to turn our proof into polynomial algorithms we need to assume that we can test membership in polynomial time in C(p − d G ) for any graph G: though this is not necessarily true in general (as an example, let p(X 0 ) = 0 for a fixed X 0 and −inf ty otherwise), but it will always hold in the applications given below.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that, by the properties of a contrapolymatroid, a polynomial algorithm to the degree specified covering problem will give rise to a solution to the minimum version of the problem, and to more general versions such as the minimum node-cost problem. For more details we refer to [1]. Define the greedy bound by gb(p) = max{ t X∈X p(X) : X is a subpartition of V } = min{1 · x : x ∈ C(p)}: this is obviously a lower bound for the minimum total size of any hypergraph covering p.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations