2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserving connectivity under climate and land-use change: No one-size-fits-all approach for focal species in similar habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some efforts use a generalist or wide-ranging species, like deer, to represent connectivity broadly for all wildlife. Movement of generalist species, however, may not adequately capture movement and habitat needs for more specialist species (Krosby et al, 2015;Meurant et al, 2018;Costanza et al, 2020). Based on differences within taxonomic groups identified in the literature (e.g., Loss et al, 2014;Fensome and Mathews, 2016;Jacobson et al, 2016;Hill et al, 2021) as well as differences among taxonomic groups, as illustrated here and elsewhere (e.g., Tessier et al, 2020), it is clearly important to consider connectivity for multiple different types of taxa when considering both road impacts and siting for mitigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some efforts use a generalist or wide-ranging species, like deer, to represent connectivity broadly for all wildlife. Movement of generalist species, however, may not adequately capture movement and habitat needs for more specialist species (Krosby et al, 2015;Meurant et al, 2018;Costanza et al, 2020). Based on differences within taxonomic groups identified in the literature (e.g., Loss et al, 2014;Fensome and Mathews, 2016;Jacobson et al, 2016;Hill et al, 2021) as well as differences among taxonomic groups, as illustrated here and elsewhere (e.g., Tessier et al, 2020), it is clearly important to consider connectivity for multiple different types of taxa when considering both road impacts and siting for mitigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Urbanization, as the core driving force that promotes land-use change, has brought many benefits to regional development, such as economic growth, infrastructure improvement, and more employment opportunities [ 34 , 35 ], but it has also produced a series of problems, such as the disorderly expansion of construction land, deforestation, and farmland loss [ 36 ]. Existing research conclusions show that changes in land-use patterns have led to biodiversity loss, ecosystem disintegration, and a reduction in the connectivity of biological populations [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENMs can be converted to SDMs through post‐modelling analysis; for instance, predictions from a climate‐based ENM can be cut based on variables (e.g. urbanized areas) not included during model fitting (Costanza et al., 2020; Pearson & Dawson, 2003). As a potential flaw, this approach may lead to information loss by a priori removing from the model output some landscape patches which instead may be suitable for a part of the species’ life cycle (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%