2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserving nonnegativity of an affine finite element approximation for a convection–diffusion–reaction problem

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t s• We present a monotone FEM scheme for a convection-diffusion-reaction problem in 2, 3D.• The considered equation does not possess an underlying maximum principle.• Sufficient conditions are given to ensure the nonnegativity of the approximations.• Numerical examples confirm the necessity and sufficiency of the conditions. a b s t r a c t An affine finite element scheme approximation of a time dependent linear convection-diffusion-reaction problem in 2D and 3D is presented. For these equatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From [24], (19) guarantees that the square coefficient matrix A in (18) is an M -matrix. Hence A is invertible, which implies a unique solution u k h to (13).…”
Section: Discrete Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From [24], (19) guarantees that the square coefficient matrix A in (18) is an M -matrix. Hence A is invertible, which implies a unique solution u k h to (13).…”
Section: Discrete Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where |J| is the determinant of the matrix that appears in the mapping from the reference triangle T to the triangle T ∈ T h (see [24] (4.6)). For the approximation of u k h in (13) Note that under assumption A4 we have that b k ∞ ≤ α and g k ∞ ≤ β( 1−γ 2 ) 2 ≤ β.…”
Section: Discrete Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We will use the following lemma to prove the convergence of fully discrete problem,Lemma If u , t , t L 2 ( 0 , T ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) , then u , t k u k u k 1 Δ t 2 Δ t 3 t k 1 t k | | u , t , t 2 d t , Proof See .Theorem Suppose | a | 1. If u k is a solution of (5.3), u , u , x L ( Ω ) and u , t , t L 2 ( 0 , T ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) . Moreover, let u m k is a solution of (5.2) and u m k L ( Ω ) 1 , then left u N u m N 2 C ( h 4 | u | 2 2 + Δ t ( F 2 + F 4 ) h 4 k = …”
Section: Fully Discretization Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%