and Stellin are to be congratulated for doggedly pursuing techniques that render pediatric cardiac surgery less morbid. One of the areas they are known for is the use of intraoperative balloon dilation in tetralogy of Fallot surgery. In their hands, intraoperative balloon dilation is only 1 step within a comprehensive management of the pulmonary valve during tetralogy of Fallot repair. 1 They have championed the use of more complex plasty maneuvers, including surgical delamination of hypoplastic or dysplastic leaflets, as well as patch reconstruction of damaged leaflets. Our unit has had a similar approach, using the same calibration of balloons they describe, aiming for an increase of the pulmonary annulus (after commissurotomy and balloon dilation) of 2 to 3 mm. However, our own results, specifically regarding long-term avoidance of reinterventions, have not been as good as the results reported in this letter. Although I agree with the criticism that the choice of balloon size may have been too aggressive in Boston, resulting in a 20% rate of leaflet tears, 2 I don't agree with this letter's conclusion, which is that their results are superior simply because they size their balloons differently and perform different (or more aggressive) leaflet pasty maneuvers. The study by Hofferberth and colleagues 2 is a matched cohort analysis of 162 patients, a statistically speaking superior design, whereas the data from Padua are purely historical/retrospective data, which render biases such as hindsight bias almost impossible to eliminate. One may also ask why this technique has not been adopted widely. As far as published data, only Boston, Padua, and New York 3 are on the map. It may be time to actively engage other centers, debate the technique in an open forum, and try to move the field forward.