1999
DOI: 10.1093/nar/27.19.3881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presetting of chromatin structure and transcription factor binding poise the human GADD45 gene for rapid transcriptional up-regulation

Abstract: GADD45 has been suggested to coordinate cell cycle regulation with the repair of DNA damage following ionizing radiation (IR). Although the GADD45 gene is transcriptionally up-regulated in response to IR, alterations in in vivo transcription factor (TF) binding or chromatin structure associated with up-regulation have not been defined. To understand how chromatin structure might influence TF binding and GADD45 up-regulation, key regulatory regions of the gene were identified by in vivo DNase I hypersensitivity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard deviation of the mean are indicated by bars Oncogene N-oct3 mediated-induction of gadd45 following UVB K Lefort et al demonstrating that it does not take any part in the UVC-response of gadd45. These observations are consistent with other studies reporting the localization of DNase I hypersensitive sites in this same region of gadd45 promoter following ionizing radiation (Graunke et al, 1999) and camptothecin treatment (Xiao et al, 2000). In this context, EMSA performed on this 50 bp region of the gadd45 promoter led us to determine that the responsive elements that mediate gadd45 UVB-induction are the octamer ATGCAAAT since no DNA/protein complex was formed when these two octamer motives were mutated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Standard deviation of the mean are indicated by bars Oncogene N-oct3 mediated-induction of gadd45 following UVB K Lefort et al demonstrating that it does not take any part in the UVC-response of gadd45. These observations are consistent with other studies reporting the localization of DNase I hypersensitive sites in this same region of gadd45 promoter following ionizing radiation (Graunke et al, 1999) and camptothecin treatment (Xiao et al, 2000). In this context, EMSA performed on this 50 bp region of the gadd45 promoter led us to determine that the responsive elements that mediate gadd45 UVB-induction are the octamer ATGCAAAT since no DNA/protein complex was formed when these two octamer motives were mutated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Most studies related to gadd45 expression in response to DNA damage have used genotoxic agents such as ionizing radiation (Carrier et al, 1994;Chin et al, 1997;Graunke et al, 1999;Papathanasiou et al, 1991;Zhan et al, 1993Zhan et al, , 1994, UVC irradiation Takahashi et al, 2001;Zhan et al, 1993Zhan et al, , 1998, camptothecin (Takahashi et al, 2001), or methyl methane sulphonate (Hollander et al, 1993;Zhan et al, 1998). Until now, studies of gadd45-responsiveness to DNA damage in human melanoma cell lines have used ionizing radiation or UVC irradiation as stressors (Bae et al, 1996;Haapajarvi et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). These observations are virtually identical to those reported for the GADD45 promoter following IR exposure (10). Although our data cannot rule out subtle chromatin alterations at p21 and related p53-regulated promoters, they clearly do not support the contention that significant chromatin alteration is needed for p53-mediated gene activation.…”
Section: Fig 6 P53 Interacts With P53 Res In Dna-damaged Hct116 Celsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…7,101 Another view of p53-depending transcriptional activation is based on the observation that the regions of chromatin within the vicinity of several p53 responsive promotes (including GADD45 and MDM2) exist in open conformations regardless of the conditions (normal versus genotoxic). [102][103][104] Constitutive hypersensitivity of these promoters to DNase I led to the suggestion that they might be nucleosome-free, and do not require significant chromatin alterations to become activated. By analogy with some genes, which are regulated by promoter proximal pausing and factors facilitating reinitiation of stalled RNA Polymerase, p53 has been suggested to induce reinitiation of transcription.…”
Section: Transcription Regulation By P53mentioning
confidence: 99%