1999
DOI: 10.1243/0954411991534780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Press-fit acetabular cup fixation: Principles and testing

Abstract: Pre-clinical testing of the fixation of press-fit acetabular components of total hip prostheses relies on cadaver or synthetic bone, but the properties and geometry of bone models differ from those of physiological bone. Cup designs use varied mechanisms for initial stability in bone; therefore, using different analogues and tests is appropriate.Press-fit cup stability was tested in the following: firstly, polyurethane (PU ) foam modelling cancellous support; secondly, glass-fibre reinforced epoxide (GFRE) tub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the primary stability was evaluated using a tangential pull-out test, which has the advantage of being adapted to the configuration of this cadaveric study [10, 15, 29]. The values of stability were obtained in the range [0–140 N] which is in agreement with the range found in the literature [1, 30, 31]. The implant stability also depends on the sinking relative to the edges of the cup because a cup in a coxa profunda is different from a cup implanted in hip dysplasia, where a part of the wall may be discovered [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, the primary stability was evaluated using a tangential pull-out test, which has the advantage of being adapted to the configuration of this cadaveric study [10, 15, 29]. The values of stability were obtained in the range [0–140 N] which is in agreement with the range found in the literature [1, 30, 31]. The implant stability also depends on the sinking relative to the edges of the cup because a cup in a coxa profunda is different from a cup implanted in hip dysplasia, where a part of the wall may be discovered [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Second, these foam blocks are commonly used to model the acetabulum in similar studies. [13][14][15][16][17] Two different acetabular cavity geometries were machined using foam blocks comprising both densities. The first geometry was a 1-mm under-reamed hemispherical cavity (high-density spherical and low-density spherical).…”
Section: Acetabular Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual geometry is inherently stable under all loading modes (Macdonald et al 1999a) and, in combination with specially developed reamers, enables more accurate cavity reaming (Macdonald et al 1999b) and intimate contact on implantation. The modified thread form enables progressive tightening of the fixation and enhanced torsional resistance and avoids stress protection at the dome and stress concentration at the thread edges.…”
Section: Rotation (°)mentioning
confidence: 99%