2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure- and Temperature-Induced Monoclinic-to-Orthorhombic Phase Transition in Silicalite-1

Abstract: The thermal, mechanical, and volumetric behavior of silicalite-1, an all-silica Mobil Five (MFI) zeolite, is elucidated by atomistic simulations. A flexible force field was selected and validated from a set of force fields to capture the intramolecular interactions of the crystal lattice. This force field accounts for realistic bond, angle, and torsional interactions among atoms of the framework alongside with conventional Lennard-Jones and Coulomb interactions. By monitoring the behavior of silicalite-1 as a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the predictions for small pore (8-ring) zeolites Boulfelfel et al modified the popular Hill-Sauer force field for silicas and zeolites [117] using fully periodic dispersion-corrected DFT calculations for reference silica zeolites [116]. The new force field provides reliable unit cell and window dimensions and even predicts the monoclinicto-orthorhombic phase transition in siliceous MFI zeolite [118]. For the zeolite-adsorbate interactions Fang et al developed a first-principles-derived force field for CH 4 in silica zeolites by using periodic DFT calculations and the DFT/CC (coupled cluster) method [115].…”
Section: Quality Of Forcefields: Siliceous Zeolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the predictions for small pore (8-ring) zeolites Boulfelfel et al modified the popular Hill-Sauer force field for silicas and zeolites [117] using fully periodic dispersion-corrected DFT calculations for reference silica zeolites [116]. The new force field provides reliable unit cell and window dimensions and even predicts the monoclinicto-orthorhombic phase transition in siliceous MFI zeolite [118]. For the zeolite-adsorbate interactions Fang et al developed a first-principles-derived force field for CH 4 in silica zeolites by using periodic DFT calculations and the DFT/CC (coupled cluster) method [115].…”
Section: Quality Of Forcefields: Siliceous Zeolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOPT has been investigated by several authors, who underlined its dependence to different variables, among those: temperature, pressure, the zeolite crystal chemistry, or the nature and concentration of the sorbate [12,17,44,18,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26]. In this study, due to the relatively high number of experimental points at P < 1 GPa, we could accurately bracket the MOPT between 0.3(1) and 0.5 (1) GPa in all but the Na-Fe MFI sample (in which the transition occurs between 0.40(5) and 0.70(5) GPa) and the Na-B MFI, for which an unambiguous split of the above-mentioned diagnostic peaks could not be detected, and the Pnma space group was, therefore, always assigned (e.g., Fig.…”
Section: Elastic Behavior Phase Transition and Pressure-induced Metha...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, zeolites have been extensively employed in the oil and gas industries as catalysts in the cracking of hydrocarbons due to their unique key features, such as the efficient shape selectivity coupled to moderate synthesis costs and eco-friendliness [2,6,10,11]. The ZSM-5 belongs to the structure-type code Mobil Five (MFI) and are characterized by an Al-doped siliceous framework with the Si/Al ratio ranging from 10 to ∞; when this ratio exceeds 1000, the zeolite is known as "Silicalite-1" [12,13]. Indeed, MFI-type porous materials comprise of several synthetic phases, whereas the only mineral known with a MFI-framework topology is mutinaite [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This structure changes to the MFI polymorph with increasing amounts of Zn-content in MgO-free samples, as clearly indicated by the changes of diffraction data in the 2θ range between 23 and 25° (Figure a–c). Such changes could be caused by the presence of a foreign cation or a structure-directing agent, temperature, pressure, and so on. , The Zn-related structural changes in our samples should not be caused by the incorporation of Zn into the framework of the zeolite due to the following reasons. As reported in a previous study dealing with Mn-ZSM-5, the Bragg peaks in the 2θ range of 7–10° shift to lower values when manganese is inside of the framework .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%