2015
DOI: 10.1109/jsee.2015.00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure and velocity cross-spectrum of normal modes in low-frequency acoustic vector field of shallow water and its application

Abstract: The pressure and horizontal particle velocity combined descriptions in the very low frequency acoustic field of shallow water integrated with the concept of effective depth of Pekeris waveguide is proposed, especially the active component of the pressure and horizontal particle velocity cross-spectrum, also called horizontal complex cross acoustic intensity, when only two normal modes are trapped in the waveguide. Both the approximate theoretic analysis and the numerical results show that the sign of the horiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the above theory which have already been published in [22,23], we can conclude that the value of critical depth changes with different receiving depth, source frequency, sound velocity profile, and seabed. The reason why these factors affect algorithm performance has never been researched.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the above theory which have already been published in [22,23], we can conclude that the value of critical depth changes with different receiving depth, source frequency, sound velocity profile, and seabed. The reason why these factors affect algorithm performance has never been researched.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The cross-spectrum calculation is performed using signals acquired by a single 3D vector sensor [20,21] or two 2D vector sensors [22,23], and the target depth classification can be achieved based on the characteristics of the crossspectrum signals. However, most of the above algorithms are theoretical studies [20][21][22][23], and the actual performance of the algorithm is rarely analyzed through the analysis of experiment data processing results [24,25]. Based on the sea experiment data processing results, this paper analyzes the influence of the ideal receiving depth concept on the performance of the algorithm while verifying the feasibility of the target depth classification algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve the problem of target depth resolution in the very low frequency field, many scholars like Hui and Yu et al [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ] proposed a cross-spectrum (between pressure and velocity) signal-processing algorithm to distinguish the surface targets and the underwater targets. Both the active component of the horizontal interactive complex acoustic intensity and the reactive component of the vertical interactive complex acoustic intensity in the low-frequency field can be used to identify target depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an acoustic vector sensor lying in an emitter’s near-field, the methods for three-dimensional localization has been developed by Wong and Wu et al [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. Many scholars like Hui and Yu et al [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ] have proposed a method for target depth classification using vertical intensity signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these methods offer rather high accuracies of localization and angle estimation, but have high complexity in the actual calculation [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. Others are based on normal mode theory in the case of exciting only the first two normal modes [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ], although these methods are of low complexity. When the frequency of research object can only excite the first two normal modes, the working band of the investigable object is greatly limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%