2009
DOI: 10.7132/jrcsa.kj00005702907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Countermeasure Control on Pressure-reducing Pipeline System Using Safety Valve (II) : Countermeasure of Water Hammer using Safety Valve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow rate of the division works Q is treated as an orifice by using the pressure difference ¨h between the upstream and downstream sides of the valve, and the area of the flow is assumed as constant, as shown in Eq. (13).…”
Section: Pressure Oscillation Due To Opening Rate Of the Valvementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow rate of the division works Q is treated as an orifice by using the pressure difference ¨h between the upstream and downstream sides of the valve, and the area of the flow is assumed as constant, as shown in Eq. (13).…”
Section: Pressure Oscillation Due To Opening Rate Of the Valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, they show advanced controlled performances for the pressure on the downstream side (secondary side), and necessary water-stop function is ensured. In addition, the verification of stability in the case where multiple pressure-reducing valves are placed in series and methods to suppress water hammer pressure using safety valves were studied experimentally, and some precautionary countermeasures are proposed (Inagaki et al, 1999;, Takahashi et al, 2009a2009b;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%