TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 1.972.952.9435.
AbstractDrilling underbalanced is often expected to prevent formation damage, avoid lost circulation, and increase rate of penetration. However, it is also risky and may lead to borehole collapse due to lack of positive support provided by the borehole mud. Hence, its feasibility should be evaluated thoroughly through an accurate evaluation of in-situ stresses and a realistic estimation of formation rock mechanical properties. These two entities combined with the proposed borehole trajectory and mud weight design play an important role in avoiding borehole instability problems and achieving the field objectives.A study was conducted in San Joaquin field in Eastern Venezuela, to evaluate the feasibility of drilling underbalanced in highly depleted sands inter-layered with normally pressured shales. Data required for the study was obtained from five wells in the field (pressures, daily drilling reports, wireline logs, leak off tests and rock mechanical tests).A geo-stress model was developed, including pore pressure model, minimum and maximum horizontal stresses, and overburden stress. The in-situ horizontal stress directions were estimated from caliper logs, image logs and other field data. Formation rock mechanical properties were obtained using a program which utilizes the log data from the field and estimates the more representative static mechanical properties, which were then calibrated with the lab results. The combined geo-stress and mechanical properties models were calibrated with respect to drilling induced fractures and breakouts observed on the image logs. The calibrated models were used to estimate the required mud weights for drilling under various degrees of underbalance. Instabilities (breakouts) associated with each degree of underbalance were also quantified. The required mud weights to avoid shear and tensile failures, or the expected breakouts for a given mud weight, can be estimated from the generated contour plots for any borehole azimuth and inclination in the field.The results of the study were successfully implemented in the field, resulting in cost benefits of $1MM over five wells. Lost circulation was significantly avoided, and improvements in drilling rate as well as savings in rig days were achieved.The outcome of the study is expected to provide guidelines for underbalanced drilling for future wells in the area.