2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure drop during air flow in aluminum foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same setup was used for pressure drop measurements. They reported similar findings as Kim et al [42] with regards to the impact of the porosity and ppi values, but further analyzed the foam properties using the inertia and form coefficient [61], and permeability. They compared their results with available correlations for the pressure drop and found no model was able to provide satisfactory agreement.…”
Section: Liquid-to-gas Heat Exchangerssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same setup was used for pressure drop measurements. They reported similar findings as Kim et al [42] with regards to the impact of the porosity and ppi values, but further analyzed the foam properties using the inertia and form coefficient [61], and permeability. They compared their results with available correlations for the pressure drop and found no model was able to provide satisfactory agreement.…”
Section: Liquid-to-gas Heat Exchangerssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Mancin et al [61,62] recently presented both heat transfer and pressure drop data for foam filled channels heated on one side by a uniform heat flux. This configuration mimics a liquid-to-gas heat exchanger.…”
Section: Liquid-to-gas Heat Exchangersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the pressure-drop increases with increasing airflow velocity in similar trends to those reported in [2,4,6,7,[10][11][12][13][14], but a third order (rather than second order) polynomial provides a better fit to the data over the entire velocity range. The different regimes can be identified by using a graphical separation method used by Boomsma et al [11] and adopted in many related works [4,6,9,13,15,16]. Figure 5 shows the various regimes and transitional regions including the commonly-studied Forchheimer regime, which was found to lie between 4 and 12 m sˉ¹.…”
Section: Length-normalised Pressure Drop and Regime Changesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The pressure-drop across monolithic (bulk) porous metals has been widely investigated, including studies reported in [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In many engineering systems, for low (laminar) flow velocities, the relationship between pressure-drop and airflow velocity is ably described by the Hazen-Darcy or Forchheimer equation [3,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When unidirectional airflow passes through those loose media, air compressibility is negligible due to slight pressure drops, and velocity in the flow direction is generally considered constant [21][22][23]. However, in contemporary air-bearing feeding systems, porous media fabricated by sintered metal that have a small porosity also receive great attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%