2005
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2005.849096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Drop of the ITER PFCI Cable-in-Conduit Conductor

Abstract: Pressure drop in the ITER PFCI cable-in-conduit conductor (CICC) has been measured at CRPP using pressurized water at room temperature. The PFCI conductor is a dual channel CICC and the coolant flows in parallel in the central channel and in the annular bundle region. In our experiment the flow in the central channel is blocked and the longitudinal friction factor of the annular bundle region is deduced from measurements of pressure drop and mass flow rate. Two conductor samples are investigated, one with and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several improvements in the design and construction of CICC since it was first proposed by Hoenig and Montgomery in 1970s [ 72 ]. The typical cross-sections of such Cable in Conduit Conductor (CICC) are shown in Figure 8 in which Type (a) CICC used in SST-1 [ 73 ], Type (b) CICC used for W7-X [ 74 ], Type (e) CICC used for ITER PF and CS conductor samples [ 75 , 76 ], Type (g) CICC used for TF conductor sample for the ITER project [ 77 ] and Type (h) CICC is ENEA conductor envisaged for the EU DEMO [ 44 ].
Figure 8 Various typical cross-sections of CICC [(a) square jacket without relief hole (b) internally round jacket without relief hole (c) round jacket without relief hole (d) square jacket with relief hole (e) internally round jacket with relief hole (g) round jacket with relief hole (h) rectangular jacket with two relief holes].
…”
Section: Cryogenic Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer In Fusion Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several improvements in the design and construction of CICC since it was first proposed by Hoenig and Montgomery in 1970s [ 72 ]. The typical cross-sections of such Cable in Conduit Conductor (CICC) are shown in Figure 8 in which Type (a) CICC used in SST-1 [ 73 ], Type (b) CICC used for W7-X [ 74 ], Type (e) CICC used for ITER PF and CS conductor samples [ 75 , 76 ], Type (g) CICC used for TF conductor sample for the ITER project [ 77 ] and Type (h) CICC is ENEA conductor envisaged for the EU DEMO [ 44 ].
Figure 8 Various typical cross-sections of CICC [(a) square jacket without relief hole (b) internally round jacket without relief hole (c) round jacket without relief hole (d) square jacket with relief hole (e) internally round jacket with relief hole (g) round jacket with relief hole (h) rectangular jacket with two relief holes].
…”
Section: Cryogenic Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer In Fusion Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis we use a correction factor for the correlation of the bundle f B = 0.7 f Katheder , as assessed by pressure drop measurements of a similar dual channel CICC with no subcable wraps [9]. Due to the presence of heater (H7) and thermometers (T 17 , T 27 and T 37 ), the flow in the central channel is perturbed and the friction is larger than in the case without instrumentation.…”
Section: Flow Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the presence of heater (H7) and thermometers (T 17 , T 27 and T 37 ), the flow in the central channel is perturbed and the friction is larger than in the case without instrumentation. Therefore, we do not include the correction factor (= 0.5) suggested by measurements in the mentioned pressure drop experiment [10], i.e. in this analysis we use f H = f Showa .…”
Section: Flow Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available database for f B of the ITER CICC, including the above-mentioned TFMC sample, is summarized in Fig.l and compared with the DC, applying suitable multipliers. The database also includes data from a CSMC (CS1.2B) short sample [6] and from two Poloidal Field Conductor Insert (PFCI) short samples [7], one with and the other without last-but-one cabling stage wraps. While the TFMC sample test was performed with N 2 , the CSMC and PFCI samples were tested with HiO, which explains the different Re B range.…”
Section: Friction In the Bundle Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%