2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3951(200101)223:2<479::aid-pssb479>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Effects on Single Wall Carbon Nanotube Bundles

Abstract: We report high pressure Raman studies on single wall carbon nanotube bundles under hydrostatic conditions using two different pressure transmitting media, alcohol mixture and pure water. The radial and tangential modes show a blue shift when SWNT bundle is immersed in the liquids at ambient pressures. The pressure dependence of the radial modes is the same in both liquids. However, the pressure derivatives dw/dP of the tangential modes are slightly higher for the water medium. Raman results are compared with s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments with pressure-transmitting media other than alcohol were, unfortunately, limited to maximum pressures of 9 GPa (nitrogen, 33 solid at 2.5 GPa) and 7 GPa (water, 39 solid at ¾1 GPa). Teredesai et al 39 argued that the absence of a phase transition up to 6 GPa in the experiment with water would rule out the possibility that the 10 GPa anomaly could be related to the freezing of the pressure-transmitting medium. For unambiguous evidence that the anomaly is an intrinsic property of carbon nanotubes, the softening should, ideally, be reproduced in an experiment to 15-20 GPa employing a fully hydrostatic pressure-transmitting medium, e.g.…”
Section: Structural Resiliencesupporting
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Experiments with pressure-transmitting media other than alcohol were, unfortunately, limited to maximum pressures of 9 GPa (nitrogen, 33 solid at 2.5 GPa) and 7 GPa (water, 39 solid at ¾1 GPa). Teredesai et al 39 argued that the absence of a phase transition up to 6 GPa in the experiment with water would rule out the possibility that the 10 GPa anomaly could be related to the freezing of the pressure-transmitting medium. For unambiguous evidence that the anomaly is an intrinsic property of carbon nanotubes, the softening should, ideally, be reproduced in an experiment to 15-20 GPa employing a fully hydrostatic pressure-transmitting medium, e.g.…”
Section: Structural Resiliencesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…It should be mentioned that the anomaly may, in principle, be related to the solidification of the pressure-transmitting medium at 10 GPa and the associated occurrence of shear strains above this pressure. Experiments with pressure-transmitting media other than alcohol were, unfortunately, limited to maximum pressures of 9 GPa (nitrogen, 33 solid at 2.5 GPa) and 7 GPa (water, 39 solid at ¾1 GPa). Teredesai et al 39 argued that the absence of a phase transition up to 6 GPa in the experiment with water would rule out the possibility that the 10 GPa anomaly could be related to the freezing of the pressure-transmitting medium.…”
Section: Structural Resiliencementioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations