2014 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/urai.2014.7057454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure feedback effects of electro-hydraulic actuator system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work can be effectively used with Brito 27 which addressed issues such as impulsive surging pressure measurement and scale factor determination which set it aloof from the issues, 28 which proposed a backstepping algorithm for the position control of nonlinear electro-hydrostatic actuators (EHAs) involving uncertainties and Choi et al 29 which ascertained the dynamic characteristics of EHA through pressure feedback having the role of damping to tackle resonance problem, which have not been considered in this proposed setup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work can be effectively used with Brito 27 which addressed issues such as impulsive surging pressure measurement and scale factor determination which set it aloof from the issues, 28 which proposed a backstepping algorithm for the position control of nonlinear electro-hydrostatic actuators (EHAs) involving uncertainties and Choi et al 29 which ascertained the dynamic characteristics of EHA through pressure feedback having the role of damping to tackle resonance problem, which have not been considered in this proposed setup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the pump-controlled EHA has higher energy efficiency than the conventional hydraulic actuator and the valve-controlled type of EHA [5,9]. However, most EHA studies conducted thus far have focused on valve-controlled EHAs [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]; these types offer a quick response, but their energy efficiency is low due to the supply of constant pressure [5]. Due to this constant pressure supply, leakage from the valves increases gradually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, backstepping control, adaptive robust control, adaptive sliding mode control, and pressure feedback have been utilized in experimental efforts to address the nonlinearity issue of valve-controlled EHAs. However, with the valve-controlled method, the double-rod cylinder and single-rod cylinder used are dynamically different and applying the load to the robot leg with the single-rod cylinder was found to be challenging [12][13][14][15][16]. Although non-linear control methods have been demonstrated with valve-controlled EHAs, these systems remain associated with low energy efficiency levels due to leakage problems stemming from the valve characteristics [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%