2013
DOI: 10.2514/1.b34629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Fluctuations (Buzzing) and Inlet Performance of an Airbreathing Missile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen, up to now no reliable prediction method of intake buzz has been developed through the analytical investigations. Therefore, numerical [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or experimental [8,13,23,25,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] methods are often used to study the buzz onset as well as its frequency and amplitude for various flow conditions. It seems that the work done by Trapier et al [18] is the most complete study among the numerical investigations because the flow separation is the key phenomenon in the buzz onset according to the Ferri [5] and Dailey [6] criteria, and to the authors' knowledge, this study is the only numerical investigation that uses the large-eddy simulation approach (detached-eddy simulation turbulence model) and three-dimensional grid to study buzz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen, up to now no reliable prediction method of intake buzz has been developed through the analytical investigations. Therefore, numerical [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] or experimental [8,13,23,25,27,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] methods are often used to study the buzz onset as well as its frequency and amplitude for various flow conditions. It seems that the work done by Trapier et al [18] is the most complete study among the numerical investigations because the flow separation is the key phenomenon in the buzz onset according to the Ferri [5] and Dailey [6] criteria, and to the authors' knowledge, this study is the only numerical investigation that uses the large-eddy simulation approach (detached-eddy simulation turbulence model) and three-dimensional grid to study buzz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed description of the MFR calculation method via total pressure data of the main rake can be found in [26,35]. It is desired for an intake to have the maximum possible values of TPR and MFR.…”
Section: Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) in [26,35], it is seen that the MFR is directly proportional to the TPR, and therefore MFR Mod vs EBR has the same graph as TPR Mod vs EBR for every freestream Mach number and will be neglected in this study. However, variation of the MFR can be studied from the intake performance curve.…”
Section: Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much information could be found in the literature on di erent aspects of various types of supersonic inlet models [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Performance characteristics of inlet in cases of extensive maneuvering range [3,4], unstart [5], buzz phenomenon, and application of boundary-layer bleed [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] have recently been investigated. In addition to these experiments, many computational studies have been accomplished on the supersonic inlet ow and buzz phenomenon as well as ow control methods [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%